Who to start

Started by Money Shot, April 04, 2015, 10:50:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ricochet

Quote from: Torpedo10 on April 04, 2015, 12:58:16 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 04, 2015, 12:57:00 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on April 04, 2015, 12:53:04 PM
Who would be your second choice Rico? I'm in the same boat but need to choose two, on of which is EMG. Banking on Anderson playing but being my M11.
So what are your options mate?
CEY. Anderson, Miller, Vanders and Heeney. Need to chose two and one of them as EMG.
Start Miller and vanders, Heeney as emergency

swans15

Which 2 of Cey, Anderson, Heeney, Miller, Vanders.

Ricochet

Quote from: swans15 on April 04, 2015, 01:03:45 PM
Which 2 of Cey, Anderson, Heeney, Miller, Vanders.
Miller Vanders

wallace999

pick one to start from clark, lamb and hogan?

RaisyDaisy


Ricochet


RaisyDaisy

Alright, I've decided to start Vanders and CEY, and Miller has the E

I'm done now. Going out to grab some lunch then get back to watch the footy :)

no eye deer

Lamb, Hogan or Lonie on the field?

Ricochet

Quote from: no eye deer on April 04, 2015, 01:11:44 PM
Lamb, Hogan or Lonie on the field?
Hogan mate, at least you know he isn't the sub

AFLWizard

Quote from: Ricochet on April 04, 2015, 12:48:35 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on April 04, 2015, 12:47:31 PM
So pretty much put the GC and Melbourne rookies on your field?
Vandenburg v Miller?
Miller


any reasons for this rico mate?

coz vanders had a pretty solid nab but miller is more consistent

Money Shot

Quote from: Ricochet on April 04, 2015, 01:12:46 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 04, 2015, 01:11:44 PM
Lamb, Hogan or Lonie on the field?
Hogan mate, at least you know he isn't the sub
There's no way Lamb will be sub imo

Ricochet

Quote from: AFLWizard on April 04, 2015, 01:14:41 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 04, 2015, 12:48:35 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on April 04, 2015, 12:47:31 PM
So pretty much put the GC and Melbourne rookies on your field?
Vandenburg v Miller?
Miller


any reasons for this rico mate?

coz vanders had a pretty solid nab but miller is more consistent
Yeh I just reckon he'll score well today, gut feeling

Ricochet

Quote from: Money Shot on April 04, 2015, 01:16:23 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 04, 2015, 01:12:46 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 04, 2015, 01:11:44 PM
Lamb, Hogan or Lonie on the field?
Hogan mate, at least you know he isn't the sub
There's no way Lamb will be sub imo
Yep unlikely but you never know bud

Money Shot

Quote from: AFLWizard on April 04, 2015, 01:14:41 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 04, 2015, 12:48:35 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on April 04, 2015, 12:47:31 PM
So pretty much put the GC and Melbourne rookies on your field?
Vandenburg v Miller?
Miller


any reasons for this rico mate?

coz vanders had a pretty solid nab but miller is more consistent
I wouldn't be calling van inconsistent just yet because from memory he was sub first game, injured second and then the one game he played fit he got 90ish

LordSneeze

Quote from: Ricochet on April 04, 2015, 01:17:43 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on April 04, 2015, 01:16:23 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 04, 2015, 01:12:46 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 04, 2015, 01:11:44 PM
Lamb, Hogan or Lonie on the field?
Hogan mate, at least you know he isn't the sub
There's no way Lamb will be sub imo
Yep unlikely but you never know bud
Go Hogna and take the 50 points.
Ive traded Lonie (Big Sub Chance) out for Hogan (F7). Lamb at (F8)