Brett Goodes Sub this week?

Vulpes · April 03, 2015, 03:59:05 PM

I'm a bit worried the Murphy owns one flank, and Boyd is listed on the other. Wouldn't you want a younger player rotating through to learn from Murphy and Boyd?

Ricochet · April 03, 2015, 04:04:36 PM

Quote from: Vulpes on April 03, 2015, 03:59:05 PM
I'm a bit worried the Murphy owns one flank, and Boyd is listed on the other. Wouldn't you want a younger player rotating through to learn from Murphy and Boyd?

I doubt Boyd will spend too much time in the backline. Especially with the mids that Bullies are missing.

RaisyDaisy · April 03, 2015, 04:42:02 PM

Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 04:04:36 PM
Quote from: Vulpes on April 03, 2015, 03:59:05 PM
I'm a bit worried the Murphy owns one flank, and Boyd is listed on the other. Wouldn't you want a younger player rotating through to learn from Murphy and Boyd?
I doubt Boyd will spend too much time in the backline. Especially with the mids that Bullies are missing.

Pretty sure Meow said that Boyd is now playing the role of rebounding defender now

Apparently he was doing it during NAB too

Not sure myself, but I remember Meow mentioning it

Ricochet · April 03, 2015, 04:44:33 PM

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 03, 2015, 04:42:02 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 04:04:36 PM
Quote from: Vulpes on April 03, 2015, 03:59:05 PM
I'm a bit worried the Murphy owns one flank, and Boyd is listed on the other. Wouldn't you want a younger player rotating through to learn from Murphy and Boyd?
I doubt Boyd will spend too much time in the backline. Especially with the mids that Bullies are missing.

Pretty sure Meow said that Boyd is now playing the role of rebounding defender now

Apparently he was doing it during NAB too

Not sure myself, but I remember Meow mentioning it

meow said he would be a midfielder that spends time across halfback. Like a McVeigh, SMitchell have done. Well thats the only comment I saw meow say about it
Libba out and no Griff, they need his experience in there

RaisyDaisy · April 03, 2015, 04:49:27 PM

It was that QB thread

Meow said that Boyd is their QB

Anyway, doesn't matter too much, Goodes wasn't redrafted for nothing. Beveridge clearly has him in the 22

honza · April 03, 2015, 04:49:58 PM

Quote from: Grufflez on April 03, 2015, 02:27:03 PM
People who went without Goodes will regret it sooner rather than later.

Slept like a baby last night.

fan_king · April 03, 2015, 08:40:53 PM

as the titile says...... who will start as the sub, here is the bench named

B. Goodes, J. Johannisen, M. Honeychurch, J. Grant

I have goodes and honeychurch both starting on the ground.

Give some reasons on who will not be sub or not? thanks.

Cant see grant being sub as his impact late in games would be waste of time (waste of time to get a gig at the best of times)

Rusty00 · April 03, 2015, 08:44:16 PM

Won't necessarily be one of the 4 named bench players, however my guess is Honeychurch.

fan_king · April 03, 2015, 08:45:21 PM

DAMN!

Doggoneit · April 03, 2015, 08:47:24 PM

I'm not really sure

I doubt it will be Grant but could be any of the other three

If it was me I would start JJ as sub, but its not me. :-\

js19 · April 03, 2015, 09:04:52 PM

JJ and Honey the only real options imo. The others are players you pick to start the game

Jroo · April 03, 2015, 09:18:49 PM

MHC is the most likely

Alka · April 03, 2015, 10:19:14 PM

Won't be Goodes, wouldn't make such sense as a sub.

I'm leaning to JJ, but could easily be Honey.

The Priest · April 04, 2015, 11:35:59 AM

Jarrod Grant will be the sub, very sure about that.

RiOtChEsS · April 04, 2015, 12:21:39 PM

Quote from: Mr Adams on April 03, 2015, 09:35:10 AM
That may be true most of the time, but history suggests that not being named on field is still a risk for us.

Looking at that team sheet, who else would cop the vest?

Clem Smith was originally named in the pocket... fantasy football is a fickle flower

im predicting Honeychurch vest