Brett Goodes Sub this week?

[Mr Adams]

He's the last named on the bench.

Looks like it could be out of he and Honeychurch for the vest in that case.

This could be a massive blow for those of us who've risked him.

Thoughts?

I do have the coin for Clancee, but have doubts about his role...

[LF]

Just because he is named last on the bench doesn't mean he will be sub,sub can be any player and even someone that is named on the field,the team sheet positions do not mean anything

[Mr Adams]

That may be true most of the time, but history suggests that not being named on field is still a risk for us.

Looking at that team sheet, who else would cop the vest?

[Mark]

well teams comes out an hour or so before game... IF Goodes is Sub quckly change him to Oxley with minutes to spare

[LordSneeze]

If Goodes is sub, I downgrade Steven and upgrade him to a premo

[js19]

Goodes is not an impact player, Honey is. As a dogs supporter I'd be shocked if Goodes wore green

[Jroo]

Can't see Brett being the sub. Even if he is, there's plenty of time to trade him to someone else.

[TexR74]

Is Macmillan a viable option to replace him?

[RaisyDaisy]

Is Macmillan a viable option to replace him?

Id say Macmillian and Clancee are the two best remaining options. Hunt next week is one too

[Colley Dogs]

Clem Smith was named on the field for Carlton and ended up with the vest. The layout of team sheets is meaningless.

[ando_10]

wouldnt even consider ditching goodes beveridge loves him apparently so will play

[justaverage]

Wont be sub, will be one of Bulldogs best

[Southstorm]

Goodes isn't really the sort of player you'd want to have as your sub anyway.

[Grufflez]

People who went without Goodes will regret it sooner rather than later.

[jfitty]

Could he play a similar roll that Gia did in the vest?