McIntosh Bench Problem

[Marcos83]

So i want his score on my field. Currently showing as emergency.

DEF: Shaw Gibbo Lumumba Goodes Macmillon Saad (McIntosh, Dalgliesh)
As it looks dalgliesh is not playing so I could swap with Macmillan and get McIntoshs score....but is their someone else than i should get instead?

Goddard(surely gets a go soon) hansen(back in a week) savage(back in a week)?

[Bully]

Savage is a decent pick, much better than Macmillan and might even be a POD for you. But just make sure he'll be back next week.

[SydneyRox]

if this is the worst problem you have for round 1 then you are doing ok.

[Knowall]

Maybe birchall?

[NoButYeah]

Is it really worth putting in a player who isn't guaranteed to play next week for, what, 50-60 points?

[Hagebear]

At least you have K-Mac. I'm down to 29 trades already  :(

[honza]

I have the same problem.

And last year I had Langdon on the pine.

I suck at bench.

[AaronKirk]

Is it really worth putting in a player who isn't guaranteed to play next week for, what, 50-60 points?

If you are going for overall it is something you definitely have to consider. If you are playing for league wins then you probably wouldn't worry too much about it.

[Keeper27]

LOL relax mate. Don't ruin your team structure for his score.
This reminds me of Langdons Round 1 score all over again.

[bonebones]

Could be the difference between 50K and nothing. 60 odd points would do it. Consider given there are unlimited trades.
Goodes to Savage?

[sammy123]

I have him on the bench as E too. But i have hamling and didn't trade hin out for this exact reason. I wasn't confident playing mcintosh at d6 i was thinking saad. You win sone and you lose some. Its only rd 1 have a whole year to make better decisions

[SydneyRox]

Could be the difference between 50K and nothing. 60 odd points would do it. Consider given there are unlimited trades.
Goodes to Savage?

savage aint back next week is he?

[The_Captain]

Just accept the fact you made a stuff up first round. Will be plenty more throughout the year. Wouldn't be selected a bloke who may not even play all year. Just back the rookie who you originally did. Never know, they may get 80 or 90 and it's not a major loss!

[SydneyRox]

Just accept the fact you made a stuff up first round. Will be plenty more throughout the year. Wouldn't be selected a bloke who may not even play all year. Just back the rookie who you originally did. Never know, they may get 80 or 90 and it's not a major loss!

thats right, mcintosh played out of his skin and looked like he belonged, but your onfield player could do the same and then how would you feel

[Desired7]

Boys birchall was named fit but not selected, ive actually had him in my side because was hooping he would play r1 but should i still keep him and take Mcintoshs score and hopefully he gets named next week. you would think so though.