Main Menu

Brayshaw

Started by colmullet, April 02, 2015, 06:53:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

JBs-Hawks

Sheed or Brayshaw?

Ricochet

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on April 03, 2015, 03:42:50 PM
Sheed or Brayshaw?
I'd probably go Sheed just because he seems be a lock to play most of the year, Brayshaw could be in and out depending how he goes

essendon

Hey Rico!!
Your going with cripps, NVB, Newton and brayshaw now?
Thoughts on Miller too?

Jay

Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 03:58:29 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on April 03, 2015, 03:42:50 PM
Sheed or Brayshaw?
I'd probably go Sheed just because he seems be a lock to play most of the year, Brayshaw could be in and out depending how he goes
Think Brayhaw is the better SC scorer though.

Ricochet

Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 03:59:42 PM
Hey Rico!!
Your going with cripps, NVB, Newton and brayshaw now?
Thoughts on Miller too?
Nah nah only 2 at this stage man.

Concerned that miller won't last when Jaeger comes back in

essendon

so you have ditched NVB and don't like newton either?

Who have you put in there place and why?

Ricochet

Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:12:47 PM
so you have ditched NVB and don't like newton either?

Who have you put in there place and why?
Waiting to see who is the sub in the Melb game to decide on the last spot

would rank them as Newton > Brayshaw probably

essendon

Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 04:18:43 PM
Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:12:47 PM
so you have ditched NVB and don't like newton either?

Who have you put in there place and why?
Waiting to see who is the sub in the Melb game to decide on the last spot

would rank them as Newton > Brayshaw probably

That still means you've gotten rid of NVB, can I ask why this is?
Your not running with vandenberg either

Ricochet

Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:21:35 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 04:18:43 PM
Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:12:47 PM
so you have ditched NVB and don't like newton either?

Who have you put in there place and why?
Waiting to see who is the sub in the Melb game to decide on the last spot

would rank them as Newton > Brayshaw probably

That still means you've gotten rid of NVB, can I ask why this is?
Your not running with vandenberg either
haha I do have vandenBerg. Yep I got rid of VB, just simply had to reshuffle my team a little
He won't be an amazing scorer but he'll play most weeks, still nothing wrong with picking him

essendon

Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 04:23:54 PM
Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:21:35 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 04:18:43 PM
Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:12:47 PM
so you have ditched NVB and don't like newton either?

Who have you put in there place and why?
Waiting to see who is the sub in the Melb game to decide on the last spot

would rank them as Newton > Brayshaw probably

That still means you've gotten rid of NVB, can I ask why this is?
Your not running with vandenberg either
haha I do have vandenBerg. Yep I got rid of VB, just simply had to reshuffle my team a little
He won't be an amazing scorer but he'll play most weeks, still nothing wrong with picking him

You have 6 rookies in the mids then. Of which I have now figured out. Thanks for that. So I have 7. Our difference is that you have vandenberg and I'll have newton/brayshaw (whichever you don't go). And then I'll have NVB.
I'm scared with vandenbergs js and I reckon it's really shaky. He's a pretty slow midfielder. That's why I'm going NVB as well as it just assures a game each week guaranteed.
Thoughts on all this?
It's been doing my head in

madskill55

Rico, what would the general consensus if these following happened:

a) brayshaw be the sub?       newton and Vandenberg in ur team then?
b) vandenberg be the sub?    what happens here?
c) newton be the sub?       brays haw and vandenberg in ur team then?

Ricochet

Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:33:09 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 04:23:54 PM
Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:21:35 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 03, 2015, 04:18:43 PM
Quote from: essendon on April 03, 2015, 04:12:47 PM
so you have ditched NVB and don't like newton either?

Who have you put in there place and why?
Waiting to see who is the sub in the Melb game to decide on the last spot

would rank them as Newton > Brayshaw probably

That still means you've gotten rid of NVB, can I ask why this is?
Your not running with vandenberg either
haha I do have vandenBerg. Yep I got rid of VB, just simply had to reshuffle my team a little
He won't be an amazing scorer but he'll play most weeks, still nothing wrong with picking him

You have 6 rookies in the mids then. Of which I have now figured out. Thanks for that. So I have 7. Our difference is that you have vandenberg and I'll have newton/brayshaw (whichever you don't go). And then I'll have NVB.
I'm scared with vandenbergs js and I reckon it's really shaky. He's a pretty slow midfielder. That's why I'm going NVB as well as it just assures a game each week guaranteed.
Thoughts on all this?
It's been doing my head in
Yeh thats fair enough mate, back your gut in. I think vanders will be ok, but noone really knows

Ricochet

Quote from: madskill55 on April 03, 2015, 04:33:37 PM
Rico, what would the general consensus if these following happened:

a) brayshaw be the sub?       newton and Vandenberg in ur team then?
b) vandenberg be the sub?    what happens here?
c) newton be the sub?       brays haw and vandenberg in ur team then?
a) yep Newton and vanders
b) I'll look at going up to VB, but I'll probably just hang onto him. At his price its not too much of a concern. Only worry would be he'd have a good chance to be dropped for RD2
c) Would probably pick VB over Brayshaw

essendon

Interesting mate. Not a bad way to do it.
I reckon I'll just risk it with NVB low scoring but good js and then if brayshaw gets dropped I'll just have to trade him before changes in price. It's all risk, can't get it right every year.