Kristian Jaksch

[HotTiges]

What do we reckon fellas? named and won't be in the starting vest. at 265k is he value? or just a waste of time in SC terms? I'm a bit up in the air with his scoring potential..

[RaisyDaisy]

Goodes is a much better option and 20k cheaper

I might consider Jaksch if Goodes doesn't get named, but pretty confident Goodes will line up

[HotTiges]

Goodes is a much better option and 20k cheaper

I might consider Jaksch if Goodes doesn't get named, but pretty confident Goodes will line up

Yeah I already have Goodes just seeing how Jaksch looked as a D4.. Taylor Hunt would seem more tempting at the moment..

[Ricochet]

Like RD said, would rather Goodes

[dosstheboss]

If he can keep his spot he could be value along with Goodes, allowing extra cash spent on the other lines - I'm toying with him at D4 also.. Or what about Macmillan from North at 270k. Upgraded to leadership group this year so no doubting his job security, but still not convinced on this structure although it would save money to be used on the higher point scoring positions.     

[Mat0369]

Jaksch is a lock for the 22. They will try and keep the back 6 as settled as possible and he will be taking one of the tall defenders week in week out. I just don't trust key defenders to score decently in SC (although I am looking at Harry Taylor but he plays a different role)

[mark44]

I'm rolling the dice and going with jaksch and goodes  at 4 and 5

[RobsOverAchieverss]

I think that he is at that awkward price , and I think there is a lot better options or rookies that I would go with Hambling, Oxley and McIntosh are my rookies and I have prems down back and clancee pearce , I have loaded up with rookies in the middle because I think the midfield yet again is where the cheap rookies are that will play, I tend to stay away from people at that awkward price.

[HotTiges]