rains, hill or grimes??

[yaqub27]

rains, hill or grimes?

who out would be the best out of the three?

and who would be worthwhile putting in my dream team?

[Murphington]

I would probably say Raines > Hill > Grimes

- Although ALOT of teams are fielding them all which could really pay off if they all play a whole year and on top of that, having them all frees up money to spend on other positions. =D

[mEnty]

Agree as above, all 3 valid picks - depends on structure you want.

[kickittome]

Does anyone know if Raines played against Brisbane yesterday ? If so, how did he go ?

[mEnty]

Was wondering the same thing, if he did play he didn't make the best and the AFL site made no comment on him.

[dread_lord09]

accordin to the afl site http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/73076/default.aspx

raines was in the team. I was wondering the same thing. hope that helps

[love4thegame]

shouldnt matter if he played or not players are always gettin rested in the nab challenge he will 100% be in the 22.

[peanut]

I'm not ashamed to say I have all 3, but I'm also not to proud so say I panic about that. my theory is that all 3 will play early, maybe not round 1. Raines is a lock and Hill is about 90% according to word out of freo.

Grimes is the interesting one, but everytime i swap him for Malceski, I find myself switching him back within minutes.

One of those roll the dice calls, especially comnsidering the lack of back cheap picks outside petrenko and maybe suban.

try fitting hill on the bench, although that is costly.

[love4thegame]

i have all 3.

Grimes is in melbournes best 22, should play im 95% sure of that.

Your right raines is 100% lock!!

And hill should play in the rebuilding freo epecially now that suban has hurt his shoulder.

[dreamteamking]

lol... ive got all 3