Main Menu

Collingwood pair on drug test

Started by Ricochet, March 30, 2015, 01:58:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

silloc

Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on March 31, 2015, 08:33:06 PM
Quote from: Barra13 on March 31, 2015, 08:15:03 PM
Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on March 31, 2015, 03:04:31 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 31, 2015, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 31, 2015, 01:53:12 PM
heres the facts we currently have
1) they were tested 3 days after they had returned from NZ
2) they were room mates in NZ
3) they wern't aware that they had taken the drug (according to neil balme)

so in my opinion theres a high chance that it was in a meal they had when they were at NZ
The NZ Beef industry has squashed that theory already.

Can you imagine them ever admitting that there could be steroids in their meat?

Can you imagine the players ever admitting that they took steroids?

2 players is not the same as a national meat industry that feeds 4.471 million people. Which one do you think will get more negative press?

Considering all the professional sports people from New Zealand have never had a problem, I think it's safe to safe that theory is bullshower

Gigantor

Quote from: silloc on April 01, 2015, 02:20:09 PM
Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on March 31, 2015, 08:33:06 PM
Quote from: Barra13 on March 31, 2015, 08:15:03 PM
Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on March 31, 2015, 03:04:31 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 31, 2015, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 31, 2015, 01:53:12 PM
heres the facts we currently have
1) they were tested 3 days after they had returned from NZ
2) they were room mates in NZ
3) they wern't aware that they had taken the drug (according to neil balme)

so in my opinion theres a high chance that it was in a meal they had when they were at NZ
The NZ Beef industry has squashed that theory already.

Can you imagine them ever admitting that there could be steroids in their meat?

Can you imagine the players ever admitting that they took steroids?

2 players is not the same as a national meat industry that feeds 4.471 million people. Which one do you think will get more negative press?

Considering all the professional sports people from New Zealand have never had a problem, I think it's safe to safe that theory is bullshower
+1
The Kiwi cricket team sure as hell wasn't on anything performance enhancing on the weekend :)

Ziplock

Quote from: Gigantor on April 01, 2015, 02:43:36 PM
Quote from: silloc on April 01, 2015, 02:20:09 PM
Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on March 31, 2015, 08:33:06 PM
Quote from: Barra13 on March 31, 2015, 08:15:03 PM
Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on March 31, 2015, 03:04:31 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 31, 2015, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 31, 2015, 01:53:12 PM
heres the facts we currently have
1) they were tested 3 days after they had returned from NZ
2) they were room mates in NZ
3) they wern't aware that they had taken the drug (according to neil balme)

so in my opinion theres a high chance that it was in a meal they had when they were at NZ
The NZ Beef industry has squashed that theory already.

Can you imagine them ever admitting that there could be steroids in their meat?

Can you imagine the players ever admitting that they took steroids?

2 players is not the same as a national meat industry that feeds 4.471 million people. Which one do you think will get more negative press?

Considering all the professional sports people from New Zealand have never had a problem, I think it's safe to safe that theory is bullshower
+1
The Kiwi cricket team sure as hell wasn't on anything performance enhancing on the weekend :)

unless they ate somewhere which got it's meat on the sly from some small farmer who was roiding up their beef, it's pretty unlikely.

Ricochet


Mat0369

I was having a think about something relating to this. If they did happen to snort something laced with clenbuterol I think I know a way they could potentially get off. Wes Welker was busted in the NFL for taking an amphetamine which fell under the PED instead of substance abuse code. He claimed someone spiked his drink resulting in him testing positive to what he thought was Molly (ended up being Adderall which is also a banned substance). Eventually the NFL was in the middle of reviewing their drug code and his suspension was lifted from performance enhancing to substance abuse which saw the suspension decreased.

So this brings me to my point, if Thomas and Keefe did take a bad batch of coke, they can claim someone spiked their drinks and then prove that is what caused the positive test though a hair sample. Hair testing can show what was in their system for months and if cocaine or whatever it was they took shows up it will help corroborate the story. I doubt anyone will fall for it, but it might be the only thing that saves them.

Ricochet

http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/collingwood-pair-lachie-keeffe-and-josh-thomas-will-be-spared-maximum-four-year-drugs-bans/story-e6frf3e3-1227305369940

COLLINGWOOD pair Lachie Keeffe and Josh Thomas will avoid four-year bans and will be able to select the most beneficial clauses from two versions of the AFL Anti-Doping Code.

The pair, who tested positive to the banned drug Clenbuterol, could know the results of “B” samples as soon as Friday.

Should those samples also come back positive, the players are certain to be charged by the AFL and will face a tribunal hearing.

But the Herald Sun understands they will be spared a maximum four-year suspension prescribed in the 2015 AFL Anti-Doping Code.

That document â€" although dated January 1 â€" was not published until after their positive samples were taken in February.

It is now in force, however, and the principle of Lex Mitior will apply to any prosecution.

It means, effectively, that any negative effect of the 2015 code is ruled out but any beneficial application of new clauses or wording can be used to help them.

The AFL had earlier indicated four-year bans were on the table, but it is now accepted the maximum applicable ban is two years.


sidvicious

Media has gone very quiet on this

Capper


Samsturmfels

When do we find out the results??
I would love to have  Thomas and Keefe back

Nige

The B samples have tested positive, these boys are in real trouble.

Mailman the 2nd


Ricochet

Well thats 2 years bans surely.

Nige

Quote from: Ricochet on May 23, 2015, 11:10:47 AM
Well thats 2 years bans surely.
Josh Thomas is a decent footballer, he may get a second chance.

Can't imagine Lachlan Keeffe having the same luck, his career is probably over.


Grazz

Quote from: sidvicious on August 10, 2015, 12:32:16 PM
Two year ban De-listed and fined 50K each
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/collingwoods-josh-thomas-lachie-keeffe-accept-two-year-bans-for-taking-banned-drug-clenbuterol/story-fni5f6hd-1227477105462

Pie's really sending a message to their list with 50k fines for the two young blokes charged, good on them. Will help other clubs with young blokes seeing that, they may start to think twice about risking it.
Hope the two Pie's can sort themselves over the ban and gain a second chance and still have an AFL career to be proud of.