Main Menu

Pendles

Started by Blues Blues Blues, March 29, 2015, 07:59:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Holz

never rfeally thought about picking him, just did.

with gary questionable you not only need him but should have him VC or C

meow meow

But good players in crap teams don't score well apparently. He's going to miss out on those magical bonus points that players receive purely for the fact that their team won!

Spite

Quote from: meow meow on March 29, 2015, 10:49:55 PM
But good players in crap teams don't score well apparently. He's going to miss out on those magical bonus points that players receive purely for the fact that their team won!

You mean Fyfe points? The ones that Ward got as well last year?

meow meow

Quote from: Spite on March 29, 2015, 11:03:58 PM
Quote from: meow meow on March 29, 2015, 10:49:55 PM
But good players in crap teams don't score well apparently. He's going to miss out on those magical bonus points that players receive purely for the fact that their team won!

You mean Fyfe points? The ones that Ward got as well last year?

3300 points per game
825 points per quarter

If it's a low SC scoring game and there's 825 points scored in Q1, then only 412 points scored in Q2, there has to be 413 points to go somewhere, so all points scored will be bumped up. On the flipside the Hawks probably suffer because they might play in games where there's 3600 real points scored so they get 10% shaved off all throughout the game if the amount of real points scored is ahead of the allocated amount available up until that point. In the game that Ward got subbed out, I bet there wasn't anywhere near 3300 real points scored. It'd be really interesting to see the raw data without any scaling or weighting applied.

shaker

This is first year I won't start him sadly will have to get him later on but looking at the Pies this year him and Sidey seem the obvious ones to cop a hard tag , there depth in quality has really dropped off with the exit of key players I know he can handle a tag but think it will affect his scores a bit , upgrade for me

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: meow meow on March 30, 2015, 12:30:39 AM
3300 points per game
825 points per quarter

If it's a low SC scoring game and there's 825 points scored in Q1, then only 412 points scored in Q2, there has to be 413 points to go somewhere, so all points scored will be bumped up. On the flipside the Hawks probably suffer because they might play in games where there's 3600 real points scored so they get 10% shaved off all throughout the game if the amount of real points scored is ahead of the allocated amount available up until that point. In the game that Ward got subbed out, I bet there wasn't anywhere near 3300 real points scored. It'd be really interesting to see the raw data without any scaling or weighting applied.

I watched the live scoring for a hell of a lot of matches last year, and I would say that in nearly every instance roughly 825 is allocated each qtr (Give or take 30-50). Never saw a qtr where only 4-500 points where allocated and then made up in a following qtr. They seem to allocate 800ish roughly each qtr and only in the last qtr of close games do they start to shuffle things around like we know they do


eaglesman

Pendles and selwood are the 2 blokes I have my doubts on ... I have 220k in the bank right now which is purely money I have from picking cheaper options

Pendles worries with a reduction in overall class in the midfield and selwood I don't know why I just seem to always have got him in my side at the time he goes through a real low

... Players like Kennedy ward danger wines griffen scream value to me

... But that 200k I have sitting there I feel like I won't be spending it adequately ... Pulling my hair out haha

Ricochet

Quote from: meow meow on March 29, 2015, 10:49:55 PM
But good players in crap teams don't score well apparently. He's going to miss out on those magical bonus points that players receive purely for the fact that their team won!
hahaha

fasttrack13

Would it be wiser to go Kennedy over Pendles?

Big Mac

Quote from: fasttrack13 on March 30, 2015, 02:54:57 PM
Would it be wiser to go Kennedy over Pendles?

No. What makes you think that?

Torpedo10

Pendles or Fyfey? Got me stumped haha.

fasttrack13

Quote from: Big  Mac on March 30, 2015, 02:57:18 PM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on March 30, 2015, 02:54:57 PM
Would it be wiser to go Kennedy over Pendles?

No. What makes you think that?

All these doubtful theories over Pendles and ablett... A safer pick maybe

colmullet

Quote from: Torpedo10 on March 30, 2015, 03:06:28 PM
Pendles or Fyfey? Got me stumped haha.

Couldn't work it out either so grabbed both lol

eaglesman

Quote from: fasttrack13 on March 30, 2015, 02:54:57 PM
Would it be wiser to go Kennedy over Pendles?
I like it!