WXV Round 1: The Debut of Christchurch and Rio de Janeiro

[Nige]

Cairo Sands - 1180/12 with CCs

B: B.Smith 144, N.Smith 78, J.McGovern 145, S.Rowe 63
M: D.Beams 108x1.5=162 (cc), D.Prestia107, L.Dunstan 72, T.Colyer 64
R: S.Mumford 98x1.5=147(cc)
F: L.Breust, P.Puopolo, R.Palmer 73, J.Lonie 49
I: B.Brown J.Batchelor 76, B.Stratton

E: J.Batchelor 76, N.Gordon 6, C.Blakely 0

vs

Moscow - 1054/11 with CCs

D: Dunn 86, McDonald 43, Docherty 147, Frawley
M: Ward 99x1.5=149 (cc), Heppell 117, Armitage 77, Bastinac 85
R: Naitanui 92x1.5=138 (cc)
F: Gray, Hogan 79, Monfries, Gault Ballantyne
U: Sheed 29, J.O'Meara S.May 104

Emg: May 104, Ballantyne, Vlastuin 115



Breust, Puopolo, Stratton, HGA (currently Lonie's 49)

vs

Gray, Monfries (sub for Port), Ballantyne and Frawley.

Starting to believe we can win this. #gocairo #underdogs

[roo boys!]

Wines going nuts, 58 at quarter time. Like a true skipper he's lifted to lead Beijing to a very strong position.

Will need Pavlich and Ryder to really lift in the next 3 quarters to give my boys playing tomorrow a fighting chance.

[Jukes]

I didn't move Vlastuin up I moved the other two down so I get him?

That's how I thought it worked, if not I would have made the first two non-playing guys

You named him as E3, so he is locked at E3, that's always how I did it

Is it in the rules?

As I said I definitely would've 100% made my first two emgs Barrass and McInnes or something so I'd get Vlastuin's score, if somebody had told me before lockout.

Defo think I should get the score

[ossie85]

I didn't move Vlastuin up I moved the other two down so I get him?

That's how I thought it worked, if not I would have made the first two non-playing guys

You named him as E3, so he is locked at E3, that's always how I did it

Is it in the rules?

As I said I definitely would've 100% made my first two emgs Barrass and McInnes or something so I'd get Vlastuin's score, if somebody had told me before lockout.

Defo think I should get the score

If you had named him first emergency, and he scored 3, it wouldn't be fair to move him down to e3.

Or if he scored 10 at e3, pretty sure you'd have no problem moving others to e1 and e2 to avoid it

locked players mean they are locked wherever they are, it is clearly the fairest way

[Jukes]

I didn't move Vlastuin up I moved the other two down so I get him?

That's how I thought it worked, if not I would have made the first two non-playing guys

You named him as E3, so he is locked at E3, that's always how I did it

Is it in the rules?

As I said I definitely would've 100% made my first two emgs Barrass and McInnes or something so I'd get Vlastuin's score, if somebody had told me before lockout.

Defo think I should get the score

If you had named him first emergency, and he scored 3, it wouldn't be fair to move him down to e3.

Or if he scored 10 at e3, pretty sure you'd have no problem moving others to e1 and e2 to avoid it

locked players mean they are locked wherever they are, it is clearly the fairest way

Well if I knew they were locked (like if somebody told me when I made the move to try and get Flossy at e1) I would've made e1 and e2 Barrass and McInnes (who btw scored 120dt in the wafl this week :3) so I'd get Vlastuin's score.

I think that would be fair because this could cost me the match, and if it does there will be hell to raise

[Nige]

Inb4 it doesn't even matter.  :P

[ossie85]

I didn't move Vlastuin up I moved the other two down so I get him?

That's how I thought it worked, if not I would have made the first two non-playing guys

You named him as E3, so he is locked at E3, that's always how I did it

Is it in the rules?

As I said I definitely would've 100% made my first two emgs Barrass and McInnes or something so I'd get Vlastuin's score, if somebody had told me before lockout.

Defo think I should get the score

If you had named him first emergency, and he scored 3, it wouldn't be fair to move him down to e3.

Or if he scored 10 at e3, pretty sure you'd have no problem moving others to e1 and e2 to avoid it

locked players mean they are locked wherever they are, it is clearly the fairest way

Well if I knew they were locked (like if somebody told me when I made the move to try and get Flossy at e1) I would've made e1 and e2 Barrass and McInnes (who btw scored 120dt in the wafl this week :3) so I'd get Vlastuin's score.

I think that would be fair because this could cost me the match, and if it does there will be hell to raise

Mate, you are suggesting that Purple check your team everytime you submit before the next lockout. He has a life.

You wanna screw around with loopholes this is a risk you take. Take responsibility for it, don't blame others, it was your screw up.

Players are locked into position. That's always been the rule, and this rule has been consistently applied for over three years now.

[Purple 77]

It's always been the case in the past. Players have always been locked into their positions after a partial lockout.

I believe nige didn't see your interchange swap before full lockout, as you put omeara at U2. Meaning your E1 in May comes on, whom scored 104, 11 less than flossy. So it might not cost you anyway.

[Nige]

It's always been the case in the past. Players have always been locked into their positions after a partial lockout.

I believe nige didn't see your interchange swap before full lockout, as you put omeara at U2. Meaning your E1 in May comes on, whom scored 104, 11 less than flossy. So it might not cost you anyway.

So his U2 is May not Pearce?  :(

Bugger.

[roo boys!]

Toronto Wolves
Def: J.Kelly, R.Shaw (51), D.Merrett (83)
Mid: S.Pendlebury (226), R.Griffen (70), A.Swallow (66), B.Cunnington (87)
Ruc: S.Morris (13)
Fwd: P.Ryder (79), J.Ziebell (81), M.Pavlich (132), L.Henderson (60), M.Robinson (85)
Int: R.Douglas (98), I.Smith

Emg: S.Morris (26), J.Crisp (85), K.Turner (29)

1131/13 - inc captain

Beijing Thunder:
D: H.Taylor, M.Jaensch (65), C.Hooker (106), C.Shenton (96)
M: O.Wines (254), L.Neale (95), J.Caddy, J.Polec (107)
R: C.Wood (60)
F: E.Betts (147), T.Bell (115), S.Mayes (6), L.Shields (x0.5)
I/C: M.Weller (95), J.Aish (44)

Emg: L.Shiels (mid), S.Mayes (def) (11), T.Miller (mid) (30)

1190/12 - capt played

Kelly + Smith + HGA

vs

Taylor + Caddy + Shiels (OOP) + 59


Wines simply too good. Well played skipper, and well played Beijing - a nice upset to kick off round 1!

[AaronKirk]

New York Revolution - 1049/12 C Played

D: Heath Shaw (85), Josh Gibson, Paul Duffield (74) Sam Fisher (100)
M: Steve Johnson, Jack Macrae (C) (160), Mitch Duncan, Leigh Montagna (110)
R: Mike Pyke (65)
F: Harley Bennell (VC) (96)  Travis Cloke (76), Josh J Kennedy(72) , Kurt Tippett (91)
U: Jed Adcock (73) , Kade Kolodjashnij (47)

E: Matt Rosa (96) , Sharrod Wellingham (70), Jarrad Waite

Dildos - 950/14

D: S.Atley (98), R.Bewick (31), B.Goodes (68), T.Chaplin (67)
M: B.Hill (C), M.Wallis (97), A.Brayshaw (86), B.Newton (78)
R: S.Durdin J.Clarke (35)
F: J.Schulz (49), T.Adams (98)(VC), L.Thomas (81), B.Lennon (0) L.Jones (54)
U: L.Jong (97), J.DeGoey (11)

E: J.Clarke (69), S.Lemmens (0), L.Jones (54)
[/quote]

[Nige]

Cairo Sands - 1229/12 with CCs and HGA

B: B.Smith 144, N.Smith 78, J.McGovern 145, S.Rowe 63
M: D.Beams 108x1.5=162 (cc), D.Prestia107, L.Dunstan 72, T.Colyer 64
R: S.Mumford 98x1.5=147(cc)
F: L.Breust, P.Puopolo, R.Palmer 73, J.Lonie 49x2=98 (hga)
I: B.Brown J.Batchelor 76, B.Stratton

E: J.Batchelor 76, N.Gordon 6, C.Blakely 0

vs

Moscow - 1232/14 with CCs

D: Dunn 86, McDonald 43, Docherty 147, Frawley
M: Ward 99x1.5=149 (cc), Heppell 117, Armitage 77, Bastinac 85
R: Naitanui 92x1.5=138 (cc)
F: Gray 122, Hogan 79, Monfries 8, Gault Ballantyne 48
U: Sheed 29, J.O'Meara S.May 104

Emg: May 104, Ballantyne, Vlastuin 115



We're gonna win bar a disaster.  :o ;D

[Hellopplz]

Rio de Janeiro Jaguars

D: B. Houli (102), A. Mackie, E. Yeo (67)
M: M. Murphy (vc) (64), G. Ablett (c) (238), D. Zaharakis (76), S. Hill (53)
R: S. Jacobs (73)
F: T. Walker (177), M. Wright (44), P. Chapman (87), M. Clark, C. Sylvia
I: K. Cornes (82), L. Taylor (86)

E: P. Cripps (m) (53), J. Riewoldt (f) (89), A.Saad (f) (21)

Colin Sylvia out for Patrick Cripps.

1246/13 including HGA (44 at the moment).



Parisian Nice Lyon Reindeers

Backs: N. Malceski (79), L. Hodge, C. Enright, J. Harbrow (86)
Mids: M. Priddis (C) (156), N. Jones (VC) (99), D. Shiel (136), D. Rich (126)
Ruck: M. Lobbe
Fwds: J. Westhoff (78), C. Rioli, D. Swan (111), T.T. Lynch (65)
Int: C. Wingard (118), D. Myers (1)

Emg: M. Williams (53), Z. Merrett (75 at half points), J. Trengove (77)

David Myers subbed off for Marley Williams, Matthew Lobbe late out for Zach Merrett.

1145/12.



Clark + Mackie + 101 points
VS
Hodge + Enright + Rioli

This is tight as!! Walker's MASSIVE performance in his Rio debut is by far the shining light for their round, along with Ablett being reliable as Captain. While for PNL, Shiel, Rich, Wingard and new recruit Swan all stepped up to help put on a valiant effort to keep us in there.

Also want to be clear, Lobbe is a late out and Myers was subbed so both our emergencies come on. But which goes where? Does E1 cover Lobbe OOP and E2 go interchange bench, or the other way around? Just want to be clear as calculated it the other way around (as a worse case scenario). When it happened a few seasons ago for us think E1 went to cover the OOP first, but want to be sure :).

[Levis43]

Fair to say I'm EXTREMELY happy with Walker!

[AaronKirk]

HP my presumption would be that it would be in order of events.

Therefore as Myers was subbed first E1 (Williams) comes on for Myers and then when Lobbe is a late out that E2 being Z.Merrett replaces him.

That is only a presumption but I may well be wrong.