IS DANIEL RICH A MUST

[mike]

Thinking  he will ave a 90 to 95 ave and for his price very tempting.  Thoughts please . Y or N

[Blues Blues Blues]

Thinking  he will ave a 90 to 95 ave and for his price very tempting.  Thoughts please . Y or N

A 'must'? No

[Jay]

Not a must but pretty bloody close.

[Woppa15]

A MUST? Not by any means....!
A bottom priced rookie who averages 60-70 would most likely make more cash than Rich averaging 90. He certainly won't be a keeper.

[ronl]

NO.

[nrich102]

I am strongly considering him.

[Ricochet]

Not a must. Will cop more attention than he did in NAB. Prefer a rookie over him

[shaker]

Been around for a long while now and has never really reached what everyone thought he would be , cheap but not a must for me

[Colty]

He is so tempting because for the first time he wont be the focal point for taggers, this might just the year he takes it to the next level, would hate to miss out.

[Gigantor]

I think he is a bit like Hurn, when ignored his premium kicking skills allows him to rack up big scores but when the heat is on I can see him scoring 60's

[Woppa15]

Not a must. Will cop more attention than he did in NAB. Prefer a rookie over him

And as history shows Rich + Tag = Bad, very very bad...!!

[kilbluff1985]

NO.

[Ricochet]

He is so tempting because for the first time he wont be the focal point for taggers

With Hanley out he still will. Beams will cop the inside mid Clowley-like taggers and Rich will cop the outside run with taggers like usual.

[bowyanger]

no

[BomberSam]

Not a must, but he is my stepping stone to GAJ if things work out!