L.Neale

truBLUE · March 16, 2015, 01:34:14 PM

Hey all was wondering if anyone has considered L Neele over griffin in their teams how do you see them scoring this season ? appreciate feedback cheers

Money · March 16, 2015, 06:14:01 PM

I think Neale will be a 95-100 or 110+! I'm taking Griffen over him though and won't really be considering Neale !

jvalles69 · March 16, 2015, 07:20:29 PM

I had Neal in my original team, but moved him out after some reshuffling, however I have reshuffled him in.

pommyadam · March 16, 2015, 07:21:54 PM

Quote from: Money on March 16, 2015, 06:14:01 PM
I think Neale will be a 95-100 or 110+! I'm taking Griffen over him though and won't really be considering Neale !

not considering a guy who you think will go 110+ and is priced under 500k
geez, some people are hard to please

TomK · March 16, 2015, 07:22:00 PM

Too awkwardly priced for me. Pass.

Money · March 16, 2015, 08:21:27 PM

Quote from: pommyadam on March 16, 2015, 07:21:54 PM
Quote from: Money on March 16, 2015, 06:14:01 PM
I think Neale will be a 95-100 or 110+! I'm taking Griffen over him though and won't really be considering Neale !

not considering a guy who you think will go 110+ and is priced under 500k
geez, some people are hard to please

I also said I think he could go 95-100 too which I think is much more nicely! And then having said that I think Griffen is a better chance to average 110 than he is! Wouldn't say hard to please though !

Ricochet · March 17, 2015, 10:37:01 AM

On the weekend we had no Barlow and Mundy only played just over 50% game time. I'd be careful

jvalles69 · March 17, 2015, 06:10:47 PM

Quote from: Ricochet on March 17, 2015, 10:37:01 AM
On the weekend we had no Barlow and Mundy only played just over 50% game time. I'd be careful

Neale played in the guts all through finals last year and the final lot of rounds with all those mentioned mids and more, they rate him to let him run free in the mids during their finals game. Might have the odd inconcsistent dud like most of the younger guys, but he'll be over 100 average and those duds will be very few and far between. I've rarely had a Docker in my side over the years, but Neale is ready to roll for me. He's priced at about 20 points less than what he will average, show me the money!

Ricochet · March 17, 2015, 06:20:09 PM

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 17, 2015, 06:10:47 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 17, 2015, 10:37:01 AM
On the weekend we had no Barlow and Mundy only played just over 50% game time. I'd be careful

Neale played in the guts all through finals last year and the final lot of rounds with all those mentioned mids and more, they rate him to let him run free in the mids during their finals game. Might have the odd inconcsistent dud like most of the younger guys, but he'll be over 100 average and those duds will be very few and far between. I've rarely had a Docker in my side over the years, but Neale is ready to roll for me. He's priced at about 20 points less than what he will average, show me the money!

Didn't say he wasn't a gun kid. But too many are jumping on based on one NAB game

jvalles69 · March 17, 2015, 06:35:20 PM

Quote from: Ricochet on March 17, 2015, 06:20:09 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 17, 2015, 06:10:47 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 17, 2015, 10:37:01 AM
On the weekend we had no Barlow and Mundy only played just over 50% game time. I'd be careful

Neale played in the guts all through finals last year and the final lot of rounds with all those mentioned mids and more, they rate him to let him run free in the mids during their finals game. Might have the odd inconcsistent dud like most of the younger guys, but he'll be over 100 average and those duds will be very few and far between. I've rarely had a Docker in my side over the years, but Neale is ready to roll for me. He's priced at about 20 points less than what he will average, show me the money!
Didn't say he wasn't a gun kid. But too many are jumping on based on one NAB game

True, hope he posts a dud next NAB cup so numbers drop again! I think he is a risky pick, but considering how he finished last season I have a feeling it wasn't a fluke.

Football Factory · March 18, 2015, 08:36:37 PM

Averaged 106 in his last 5 games (94,107,124,104,99) had a very good finals series. Looked pretty good in the Nab games he's played, 28 and 33 possessions. Cant remember where I read it but he said he wanted to tackle more after his first Nab game where he had 0 tackles, in his next game he had 8. Think he's underpriced a tad and willing to take a punt on him at the moment.

d.clohesy · March 19, 2015, 09:46:46 AM

If he gets his tackle numbers up to those numbers each week he will be a consistant 105+ av. So you woukd have to consider him at that price

Mr.Craig · March 22, 2015, 11:23:39 PM

Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on March 18, 2015, 08:36:37 PM
Averaged 106 in his last 5 games (94,107,124,104,99)

I just wonder with the way price increases are calculated now if that might give him an early round boost.

pommyadam · March 23, 2015, 10:10:45 PM

surely they'd be exempt from the calculations (being a completely different year)
but who really knows

Ricochet · March 23, 2015, 10:18:53 PM

TEAM & PLAYER VALUE
- Playersâ€™ Prices change from Round to Round depending on how they have been performing over the previous weeks and months.
- The Playersâ€™ Prices will change based on a formula that takes into account their past performances. All games played by the Player since the start of the season are taken into account in the calculation of their Price changes, with a sliding scale of weightings with the most recent game receiving the highest weighting, as well as a component of their performance last year - if they played last year!