mucked around for a while !! PLEASE LEAVE THOUGHTS

[dan77]

Def : hibbard, h shaw, geary, whitecross, ibboston, smedts, ( dick, hamling )

Mids : ablett, pendles, beams, griffin, neale, newton, van berlo, cripps ( dumont, vandenberg )

Rucks : nick nat, bellchambers ( nankervis, cox )

Forwards : gray, swan, martin, mitchell, RYDER, clarke ( salem, lambert )

Going for ryder in the forwards to pinch hit for bellchambers.....

thoughts ??

[bozza09]

somehow I don't think ryder will be pinch hitting for bellchambers.

[dan77]

Why wouldnt ryder pinch hit for bellchambers.... ? I do realise they are not im the same team. But if Ryder plays I think in ports line up he could pull 80-90. So if bellchambers sucks ...Ryder will go into the rucks....ie pinch hit.

[jvalles69]

Definition of pinch-hit - act as a substitute for someone, especially in an emergency

Haha, you're both right.  I think he assumed you still thought Ryder was playing for the Bombers, and he'd "pinch-hit" there in the ruck.  You obviously meant "pinch-hit" for YOUR fantasy team.

Ryder could be good and I've toyed with the idea of having him in my forward line so he can be swapped with Cox when needed, could be a valuable tool, or could be useless if there are no times to use it.

Overall your team looks pretty good.

[dan77]

Thanks jvalles. Yeah I know what you mean. Ive tossed that up also. Is bartel a better option with a ballpark of 90-120 ? Also with unlimited trades until rount two is Ryder wasted in the forwards......