What's the story with Greenwood?

[jeesh]

Is Greenwood injured? Why did he only play the first 2 matches of the nab challenge?

[korza]

Because he is hopeless

[Capt Cunners]

Because he is hopeless

Just like your post.

Im not sure with Greenwood, should play all 22 games barring injury, and in the midfield as a tagger.

[Torress]

thats right monty lover, looks likely to do a tagging role - rumour states brad scott is a fan and spot in 22 is quite secure. i think he will be a decent cash cow - can see him averaging 70 - 80 hopefully and once he gets to 400k(fingers crossed) he should be traded straight out for a fallen prem

[SCADDICT]

Torress, that would be an absolute dream mate. Personally as a young tagger can't see him averaging above mabye 65 but even then at his price he will a frikkin awesome cash cow

[CFC 1979]

don't know what scotty is going to do with him this year

[Torress]

scaddict 65 (equating to around the 350k mark) will do me mate!!!  if he starts averaging that early thats great - all he needs is one good game to boom around 400k from that point on then its a trade out. compared to what else in on offer down back i like him the most- hunt off injury but still a good cow himself as a proven point scorer. - ladson to me is just a no. - the eski we all just aren't sure of yet with kennelly and shaw(who they got to replace kennelly) and that small oval at SCG with how the swans play doesn't favour the wing position where eski will be playing i don't think.  -schoemakers prob doesn't have the scoring potential of any of these guys but could be a handy cow esp being the 3rd tall with gibson there now with a bit of rebound work.
anyway we are all prob gonna have 2 mid priced defenders - greenwood prob the fittest if he is set 4 midfield rotations and hunt being the best there i think with proven 80 season averages at a current price tag reflecting 50 odd season average(i'd say if he is named round 1 will be very popular and so he should be)

[m0nty]

He broke his toe getting his pants on, out for 2-3 weeks.  :'(

http://www.kangaroos.com.au/news/blogarticle/tabid/9795/newsid/90728/default.aspx

[Prospector_1]

Now that's very unfortunate. Seriously though, what was he doing with his pants off?

[Torress]

again dammit!! :'(

[CFC 1979]

SC LOGIN
EDIT TEAM
TRADE
SELECT ?


AAAHHHHHHHHHHH 8)

[Prospector_1]

Now that's very unfortunate. Seriously though, what was he doing with his pants off?

Apparently going downstairs.

Next question: Why going downstairs with pants off?

[CFC 1979]

Now that's very unfortunate. Seriously though, what was he doing with his pants off?

Apparently going downstairs.

Next question: Why going downstairs with pants off?

Drew Petrie ?

[Capt Cunners]

Now that's very unfortunate. Seriously though, what was he doing with his pants off?

Apparently going downstairs.

Next question: Why going downstairs with pants off?

Drew Petrie ?

Was that meant to be a joke?

[CFC 1979]

just logiclly following the post to it's conclusion

No offense meant

withdrawn 8)