POD Contributions

Started by bowyanger, March 04, 2015, 10:45:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Gigantor

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 06, 2015, 05:02:45 PM
I'm getting 22.97 for Newnes, not 15  :-\

21.40 for Bellchambers too

I guess a lot has changed since you recently looked for me  :o
+1

Ricochet

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 06, 2015, 05:02:45 PM
I'm getting 22.97 for Newnes, not 15  :-\

21.40 for Bellchambers too

I guess a lot has changed since you recently looked for me  :o
Yeh your right. I've had that stats page open for a while and hadn't refreshed it :o

bowyanger

Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on March 05, 2015, 12:51:55 PM
Quote from: Hippo on March 05, 2015, 12:00:20 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 05, 2015, 11:20:48 AM
Quote from: Hippo on March 05, 2015, 11:15:07 AM
Can someone please tell me what % Bonts and Parker are? thanks
Bonts 8.73
Parker 5.61
Thanks bud!

Bonts is in a few more than i expected

How is Bontempelli in more teams than Wines??? Will average 85 at best.

I reckon its only the clever dickies that are onto the Wines show...there are lotsa muntards that play SC

That JPK stats surprises me

bowyanger

#33
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 04, 2015, 11:29:31 PM
Ryder will still average high nineties but his points will drop as he is getting less ruck time and KPF forwards are not reliable for scores

they have Shulz so they may also use Ryder as a HF type an extra avenue towards goal

D Smith is my current POD forward

Don't think Roughy and Franklin playing together suffered from this Schulz / Ryder issue you speak of.

Did you miss the bit about Port banging it on Ryders head constantly?...Agreed key forwards aren't that reliable but put them in a dominant side like Franklin, Cloke a few years ago when the pies were going well and qetting quick forward entries

Jonathan Brown used to score well when the Lions were good

NRoo when the Saints were ok

If anything Ryder has a bigger advantage over the above because he will be around the ground rucking then resting forward = profit

211 resting fwd with Pav before his toe fell off definitely didn't suffer in the scoring stakes..

Hmm...then theres BigCox and NicNat when Nic Nat was fit...pretty sure they pumped out some pretty good ave's playing together in ruck & forward

Big Mac

Not sure you can compare Ryder to guys like Buddy, NRoo etc. I think the general consensus is that Ryder will play as a forward and then take the ruck for maybe 20% of the time. He may have good delivery, but he definitely isn't as good as the names you listed.

bowyanger

Quote from: Big  Mac on March 06, 2015, 10:07:10 PM
Not sure you can compare Ryder to guys like Buddy, NRoo etc. I think the general consensus is that Ryder will play as a forward and then take the ruck for maybe 20% of the time. He may have good delivery, but he definitely isn't as good as the names you listed.

Agreed but your only as good as the blokes around you

Surely if you play in a good side your general play during the game is going to be better  = PPG increase? Simple mechanics really

I know I played much better in a really good side than an average one

Over the last 3 years, Ryders SC ave has actually been comparible to NRoos last 5 years and Franklins last 3 years

Franks is a freak and actually scored massive for a while there around 2010 when Hawks weren't so dominant...but really Ryder and Franklin have different ways of influencing a game = SC point allocation

You may not think Ryder can replicate this playing in the ruck (easy points) and resting fwd (constant quick ball - being tall and a massive jump)..but I do

Odds On

Hey guys, don't have supercoach gold, would someone be able to give me the %'s of the following:

Def:
Hibberd
Kelly
Hurn

Mids:
Dangerfield

Fwds:
Bartel
Cooney

Rusty00

Def:
Hibberd - 11.43%
Kelly - 2.16%
Hurn - 4.47%

Mids:
Dangerfield - 12.08%

Fwds:
Bartel - 6.71%
Cooney - 2.52%

Hagebear

 Have Zorko as my X factor this year. Won't have any attention on him this year. Will play his high half forward/midfield role and do as he pleases. Think he can push his average to 105 this year.

Holz

all these good options wit low ownership. Im sure some of these guys would have huge ownership in top 5000 teams.

Sabretooth Tigers

Quote from: Holz on March 15, 2015, 11:46:32 AM
all these good options wit low ownership. Im sure some of these guys would have huge ownership in top 5000 teams.

And they're only POD's when your opponent doesn't have them.

Jackross10

Quote from: Holz on March 15, 2015, 11:46:32 AM
all these good options wit low ownership. Im sure some of these guys would have huge ownership in top 5000 teams.

Josh P Kennedy

bowyanger

Quote from: Hagebear on March 15, 2015, 07:42:40 AM
Have Zorko as my X factor this year. Won't have any attention on him this year. Will play his high half forward/midfield role and do as he pleases. Think he can push his average to 105 this year.

Ive been thinking this a lot....


JBs-Hawks

Quote from: bowyanger on March 16, 2015, 08:21:23 PM
Quote from: Hagebear on March 15, 2015, 07:42:40 AM
Have Zorko as my X factor this year. Won't have any attention on him this year. Will play his high half forward/midfield role and do as he pleases. Think he can push his average to 105 this year.

Ive been thinking this a lot....

With the addition of Beams, christo, Redden and rich where is he going to get mid time? He scores well playing in the middle not up forward

H1bb3i2d

Meh. Why risk someone like Zorko hovering around 95-100 when you want a 105, when you can get a Dusty or a BJ who are just 100x safer, and have an even higher ceiling of 105+ that Zorko doesn't?