Hawker's Preseason

Started by Hawker_08, February 25, 2015, 09:11:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1 2
User actions

Hawker_08

February 25, 2015, 09:11:55 AM Last Edit: February 25, 2015, 09:26:00 AM by Hawker_08
Hey guys, really need some help atm. Very uncertain about how my team is shaping up and some of my selected players. Here goes.

Def: Shaw, Hodge, Hibberd, Newnes, Seedsman, Goddard, (Hamling, Maynard)

Mid: Ablett, Pendlebury, Selwood, Sloane, Rich, Heeney, Boakhorst, Freeman, (Dumont, Steele, Krakouer)

Ruck: Nic Nat, Leunberger, (Nankervis)

Fwd: Deledio, Goddard, Franklin, Swan, Clark, Hogan, (Daniel, Lambert)

Cheers Lads, feedback greatly appreciated

nperera95

#1
February 25, 2015, 09:19:40 AM
def: Strong back. Like the pod in hodge.
mid: You'll have to get rid of Heeney as he is injured and won't play early. Maybe rich to nvb? gives you more cash.
ruck: little risky especially when you don't have cover. And you are missing your R3  :P
fwd: Solid fwd

Great start. Few tweaks here and there will may your team look much better :)

YoungGun

#2
February 25, 2015, 10:49:09 AM
No need to be very uncertain. Not a bad team, im not sold on rich. If you want a midpricer I say wells otherwise keep it to guns and rookies but if you like rich and want a midpricer thats fine. Go with what you like.

As said above the only thing I think to be worried about is if leuey goes down or picks up a  niggle because you have no cover. But that's a problem we all will have to deal with by either just hoping it doesnt happen or getting in ryder or tbc for cover.

Woppa15

#3
February 25, 2015, 11:49:46 PM
Quote from: nperera95 on February 25, 2015, 09:19:40 AM
def: Strong back. Like the pod in hodge.
mid: You'll have to get rid of Heeney as he is injured and won't play early. Maybe rich to nvb? gives you more cash.
ruck: little risky especially when you don't have cover. And you are missing your R3  :P
fwd: Solid fwd

Great start. Few tweaks here and there will may your team look much better :)

Hodge doesn't look like being much of a POD this year. SC Gold already has him in 17% of sides.....

PICCOLLO

#4
February 26, 2015, 08:45:20 AM
Very solid.
When you see a team and wonder if its under the salary cap, you know its jam packed with quality

nperera95

#5
February 26, 2015, 08:53:29 AM
Quote from: Woppa15 on February 25, 2015, 11:49:46 PM
Quote from: nperera95 on February 25, 2015, 09:19:40 AM
def: Strong back. Like the pod in hodge.
mid: You'll have to get rid of Heeney as he is injured and won't play early. Maybe rich to nvb? gives you more cash.
ruck: little risky especially when you don't have cover. And you are missing your R3  :P
fwd: Solid fwd

Great start. Few tweaks here and there will may your team look much better :)

Hodge doesn't look like being much of a POD this year. SC Gold already has him in 17% of sides.....

oh boy... Haven't seen him in many sides on here. 17.9%  :o

Hawker_08

#6
March 02, 2015, 02:16:37 PM
After the first week of the nab cup i have made a few changes and narrowed my sides down to two options

Option 1:

Def: Shaw, Hibberd, Birchall, Newnes, Whitecross, Goddard, (Saad, Edwards)

Mid: Ablett, Rockliff, Pendlebury, Barlow, Rich, Anderson, Boakhorst, Freeman, (Dumont, Steele, Krakouer)

Ruck: Nic Nat, Zac Smith, (Read)

Fwd: Goddard, Franklin, Martin, Swan, Clark, Hogan, (Daniel, Lambert)

Option 2:

Def: Shaw, Hibberd, Birchall, Newnes, Higgins, Whitecross, (Goddard, Saad)

Mid: Ablett, Pendlebury, Beams, Barlow, Dangerfield, NVB, Anderson, Boakhorst, (Freeman, Vandenberg, Lambert)

Ruck: Nic Nat, Leunberger, (Read)

Fwd: Goddard, Martin, Swan, Salem, Clark, Hogan, (Karnezis, Daniel)

Cheers lads and let me know your thoughts and ideas on which option is better.

swans15

#7
March 02, 2015, 02:20:26 PM
Would rather option 2 mate with the deeper backline as rookies look limited this year, however, I would not get caught up with Shaun Higgins and look elsewhere for d5.

barlowlove

#8
March 02, 2015, 02:22:20 PM
I like the structure of Option 2, but couldn't bring myself to select Higgins in the backline.
If you still like Rich, I'd considering going Option 2 but downgrading Danger to Rich, allowing you to get whoever you like for Higgins, and giving you cash to spare (I'm guessing)

Money Shot

#9
March 02, 2015, 08:57:23 PM
team 2

Hawker_08

#10
March 03, 2015, 08:58:35 PM Last Edit: March 03, 2015, 09:03:50 PM by Hawker_08
Hey Guys. I have locked in prices and the majority of players for my squad but am undecided un my structure. Would love your thought as to which way would be the best way to go.

Shaw, Hibberd, Birchall, Newnes, _______, Goddard (Kolo, Saad)

Ablett, Pendles _____ - Premo, JPK, Sidey, ______ - Rookie, Anderson, Boakhorst (Freeman, Vandenberg, Kraouer)

Nic Nat, Leunberger

Franklin, Martin, Swan, _____, Hogan, Lambert (Clark, Daniel)

$1,507,100 remaining

Cheers Boys

WizzFizz

#11
March 03, 2015, 09:50:56 PM
do not like the sidey pick

swans15

#12
March 04, 2015, 07:00:11 AM

GCSkiwi

#14
March 04, 2015, 12:46:20 PM
I actually like the sidey pick as a risky move but one that could pay off big time. Go with your gut, I won't pick him but that's because my structure is different.

Not sure I like relying on H.Goddard on field, we'll see how they go but will he hold a spot, if he even starts round 1?

Anderson looked really good for the Hawkers but will there be space for him round one? I feel like he ans Heeney could be red herrings, future guns but too hard to break into their teams best 22, better off looking at others playing well in clubs which need a change...

Caleb Daniel didn't get a run NAB 1, I don't know if there's any insight into why? But seems risky to pick him based on that...
Print
Go Up Pages1 2
User actions