Main Menu

X vs Y

Started by Ricochet, February 20, 2015, 05:49:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kellogscrunchynut

Quote from: SinnerZ on February 28, 2015, 03:20:27 PM
Barlow vs Pendlebury
That's a tough one currently got Barlow in my team over Pendlebury. I reckon Pendles is more likely to attract a tag although his scoring doesn't seem to get too affected by it. Down to bye structure or opinion no this one.

TomK


Barra13

Quote from: SinnerZ on February 28, 2015, 02:55:53 PM
Got a couple here  ;D ;)

Firstly - Treloar vs Greene (want one of these in my team but seriously one day i like Greene, and the next day im feeling Treloar)
????


And secondly i have a multiple choice one that i am undecided on at this point!?

A) Whitecross, Barlow, Van Berlo
B) Ibbotson, Parker, Newton

I too am in the same boat with Treloar/Greene. Greene is an animal when he is on fire and Treloar in his playing career stats wise has only been beaten by 1 person and that is Jelwood - and only just I might add.

I'd go option B) with that one. Parker and Barlow are very similar scoring wise. It really comes down to the other 2 and I think Ibbo and Newton will be ahead of WhiteX and NVB.

Chelskiman

Pendles v Sidey

Really is a flip of the coin, which is why I'm having a hard time deciding. 

Kellogscrunchynut

Quote from: Chelskiman on March 06, 2015, 11:00:13 PM
Pendles v Sidey

Really is a flip of the coin, which is why I'm having a hard time deciding.
I'm going with Sidey, DT Talks analysis of him put me over the line.

LF

Quote from: Chelskiman on March 06, 2015, 11:00:13 PM
Pendles v Sidey

Really is a flip of the coin, which is why I'm having a hard time deciding.

Sidey was my first picked mid for this year,I reckon he is going to have a great season.

Chelskiman

Quote from: Kellogscrunchynut on March 06, 2015, 11:31:23 PM
Quote from: Chelskiman on March 06, 2015, 11:00:13 PM
Pendles v Sidey

Really is a flip of the coin, which is why I'm having a hard time deciding.
I'm going with Sidey, DT Talks analysis of him put me over the line.

Yeah, Sidey is in my team at the moment at M4 (Rocky, Ablett and Barlow are my others) but I can't even remember the last time I didn't start with Pendles.  Both will end up in my team at some point (unless something crazy happens) so I guess the real question is who is going to start the season off better?

hawkboy80

KK, L.Mac, Langdon, so technically thats ( x vs y vs z )

TomK

Probably KK but wouldn't touch any personally.

hawkboy80

Quote from: TomK on March 07, 2015, 04:36:05 PM
Probably KK but wouldn't touch any personally.
really, I rate kk and think he could be a d5 keeper this year

Luke919

Barlow and NVB vs A Swallow and Griffen?

SinnerZ

Been thinking about this one for a while.

Nic Nat and Taylor Adams

or)

Leuenberger and Bartel

Ricochet

Quote from: hawkboy80 on March 07, 2015, 01:48:58 PM
KK, L.Mac, Langdon, so technically thats ( x vs y vs z )
Wouldn't go near any man. But KK of that lot

Quote from: Luke919 on March 08, 2015, 11:00:23 AM
Barlow and NVB vs A Swallow and Griffen?
Barlow and NVB are better picks in terms of keeper and cash generation imo

Quote from: SinnerZ on March 08, 2015, 03:54:12 PM
Been thinking about this one for a while.

Nic Nat and Taylor Adams

or)

Leuenberger and Bartel
Don't really like any of those combo's tbh.

Belly and Bartel would be better if you don't have Bellchambers yet

pommyadam

Quote from: Ricochet on March 08, 2015, 04:54:59 PM
Quote from: Luke919 on March 08, 2015, 11:00:23 AM
Barlow and NVB vs A Swallow and Griffen?
Barlow and NVB are better picks in terms of keeper and cash generation imo

wouldn't be relying on Swallow and Griff as cash-cows
they're the possible 105 averagers for cheap

Ricochet

Quote from: pommyadam on March 08, 2015, 06:25:12 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 08, 2015, 04:54:59 PM
Quote from: Luke919 on March 08, 2015, 11:00:23 AM
Barlow and NVB vs A Swallow and Griffen?
Barlow and NVB are better picks in terms of keeper and cash generation imo

wouldn't be relying on Swallow and Griff as cash-cows
they're the possible 105 averagers for cheap
105+ from both is a little bit of a stretch imo. Both have only gone 100+ once in their careers