Guys if i start Goldy-Nic Nat....

[H1bb3i2d]

Averaging 20 possies a game is decent man

Don't get me wrong, it's decent. But it's not as high as plenty of the juniors who average high 20s, hence I said he was never a "huge" possession getter.

My reservation would be that sure he could score very well off 16 possessions at junior level, but I doubt he'd be able to maintain that efficiency in the AFL. I certainly hope he does do well though.

[meow meow]

Averaging 20 possies a game is decent man

Don't get me wrong, it's decent. But it's not as high as plenty of the juniors who average high 20s, hence I said he was never a "huge" possession getter.

My reservation would be that sure he could score very well off 16 possessions at junior level, but I doubt he'd be able to maintain that efficiency in the AFL. I certainly hope he does do well though.

His SANFL form is a much better indicator of his scoring potential. Averaged 50 something in DT and 70 something in SC.

[New Skinn]

Not sure if I've missed it, but no one has said Nic Nat and Goldy have the same bye round. I think your decision is made there, before any stats or injury risks are concerned!

[meow meow]

^ What does it matter? Every ruck that you pick is going to miss a match. Having 1 ruck and 1 mid out is the same as having 2 rucks out.

[New Skinn]

Your putting too much pressure on your other lines in round 13. By mid season, only half your bench could be filled with scoring players. That factor and Nic Nats injury risks, says a definite no from me. But go for it if you think that's the way to go.

[LF]

Not sure if I've missed it, but no one has said Nic Nat and Goldy have the same bye round. I think your decision is made there, before any stats or injury risks are concerned!

No not missed at all its best 18 scores taken from the players fielded anyway so doesn't matter if 2 rucks are out in the same bye round

[RaisyDaisy]

Not sure if I've missed it, but no one has said Nic Nat and Goldy have the same bye round. I think your decision is made there, before any stats or injury risks are concerned!

No not missed at all its best 18 scores taken from the players fielded anyway so doesn't matter if 2 rucks are out in the same bye round

It doesn't matter from a positional point of view, but it does matter when it's 2 premo's not playing. Just make sure you have premo's playing in other lines to put up a decent score

[LF]

Not sure if I've missed it, but no one has said Nic Nat and Goldy have the same bye round. I think your decision is made there, before any stats or injury risks are concerned!

No not missed at all its best 18 scores taken from the players fielded anyway so doesn't matter if 2 rucks are out in the same bye round

It doesn't matter from a positional point of view, but it does matter when it's 2 premo's not playing. Just make sure you have premo's playing in other lines to put up a decent score

Yep exactly

[New Skinn]

Not sure if I've missed it, but no one has said Nic Nat and Goldy have the same bye round. I think your decision is made there, before any stats or injury risks are concerned!

No not missed at all its best 18 scores taken from the players fielded anyway so doesn't matter if 2 rucks are out in the same bye round

It doesn't matter from a positional point of view, but it does matter when it's 2 premo's not playing. Just make sure you have premo's playing in other lines to put up a decent score

Yep exactly

Each to there own. I went from around 4k to about 800 rank after the bye rounds, as I like having 21 or 22 scoring players play in each round. Therefor the couple of crap sub vest scores you get, get eliminated. I just think your putting too much pressure in not having too many round 13 premo's in your other lines. If Nic Nat didn't have injury issues and/or wasn't unlikely to get rested like previous years, then I would take Goldy and Nic Nat, but your giving yourself 2 headaches by getting in those 2 players.

[fasttrack13]

^ What does it matter? Every ruck that you pick is going to miss a match. Having 1 ruck and 1 mid out is the same as having 2 rucks out.

[DaveElNacho]

^ What does it matter? Every ruck that you pick is going to miss a match. Having 1 ruck and 1 mid out is the same as having 2 rucks out.

Makes a difference when the ruck has 1 bench spot (that prob won't even be playing) and midfield has 3. Try and field as many as you can over the byes.

[eaglesman]

just on Lycett... Sinclair actually took the honours in the game against all stars the other night .... Think it could be a risk picking either of them as the battle for 2nd ruck spot looks to be a killer

[GoLions]

^ What does it matter? Every ruck that you pick is going to miss a match. Having 1 ruck and 1 mid out is the same as having 2 rucks out.

Makes a difference when the ruck has 1 bench spot (that prob won't even be playing) and midfield has 3. Try and field as many as you can over the byes.

Yeah but pigeonhole principle. You're gonna have at least one bye round with at least 4 players missing from your mids, so at least one donut. Unless you plan on using the majority of those 9 trades in the midfield during the byes. But I'm not gonna be using trades just to cover donuts.

[blue]

^ What does it matter? Every ruck that you pick is going to miss a match. Having 1 ruck and 1 mid out is the same as having 2 rucks out.

Makes a difference when the ruck has 1 bench spot (that prob won't even be playing) and midfield has 3. Try and field as many as you can over the byes.

Yeah but pigeonhole principle. You're gonna have at least one bye round with at least 4 players missing from your mids, so at least one donut. Unless you plan on using the majority of those 9 trades in the midfield during the byes. But I'm not gonna be using trades just to cover donuts.

If you plan and upgrade or downgrade during the byes round 13 should be the easy week

[GoLions]

^ What does it matter? Every ruck that you pick is going to miss a match. Having 1 ruck and 1 mid out is the same as having 2 rucks out.

Makes a difference when the ruck has 1 bench spot (that prob won't even be playing) and midfield has 3. Try and field as many as you can over the byes.

Yeah but pigeonhole principle. You're gonna have at least one bye round with at least 4 players missing from your mids, so at least one donut. Unless you plan on using the majority of those 9 trades in the midfield during the byes. But I'm not gonna be using trades just to cover donuts.

If you plan and upgrade or downgrade during the byes round 13 should be the easy week

It doesn't matter if it's the easy week or not. That just means that R11 and/or R12 will see you with 4+ mids out and a donut. More players on the mid bench also means more players out during each bye round.