Backs - almost sorta not quite premos

Started by hawkboy80, February 17, 2015, 02:01:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Holz

Quote from: Mat0369 on February 18, 2015, 12:05:40 AM
Quote from: Holz on February 18, 2015, 12:01:49 AM
anyone considering Alex Rance

KPP rule, none bar Buddy. Especially fullbacks

he has gone 84 87 87 89 as a full back, why would his scoring change.

His low score was 71, he is a very good option.

Mat0369

Quote from: Holz on February 18, 2015, 12:37:08 AM
he has gone 84 87 87 89 as a full back, why would his scoring change.

His low score was 71, he is a very good option.

Because 89 is probably the ceiling for a guy that gets lock down jobs as a key defender. There are at least 15 guys I would prefer over him that I can see scoring better.

Holz

Quote from: Mat0369 on February 18, 2015, 12:46:45 AM
Quote from: Holz on February 18, 2015, 12:37:08 AM
he has gone 84 87 87 89 as a full back, why would his scoring change.

His low score was 71, he is a very good option.

Because 89 is probably the ceiling for a guy that gets lock down jobs as a key defender. There are at least 15 guys I would prefer over him that I can see scoring better.

people said that about scott thompson

Mat0369

Quote from: Holz on February 18, 2015, 12:49:53 AM
people said that about scott thompson

and Thompson averaged 78 last year after the one big year. I also don't think Richmond want the ball in his hands all that often like the Dogs used to chip it around to Lake. If you are going down that route you are better off taking a punt on Mackie.