Nat Fyfe injury

Started by Woppa15, February 13, 2015, 02:52:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

My Chumps

Quote from: Holz on February 13, 2015, 05:17:24 PM
Selwood

2 missed
0 missed
0 missed

yes the injury means nothing, but its just an indication that he just isnt the safetest player and this reminds you.

lets say he plays 20 which he has only done once in his career. If he averages 120 than that equates to 115.5 average when you take into account a 70 average player covering him (which is very optimistic)

He needs to average 125 if he is missing two games just to match a guy who averages 120 and plays 22.
It's a seriously good case for Joel who seems to be getting overlooked this year.

GoLions

Quote from: tbagrocks on February 13, 2015, 06:52:46 PM
Real problem with Fyfey is he isn't cheap, guys that may well outscore him like JPK are cheaper, so it seems crazy to start Nat? :o
I'm sorry, but I believe his name is Josh Kennedy, not JPK. Why are you being a sheep teabs and using an abbreviation/acronym?

honza

Quote from: GoLions on February 15, 2015, 03:15:45 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 13, 2015, 06:52:46 PM
Real problem with Fyfey is he isn't cheap, guys that may well outscore him like JPK are cheaper, so it seems crazy to start Nat? :o
I'm sorry, but I believe his name is Josh Kennedy, not JPK. Why are you being a sheep teabs and using an abbreviation/acronym?
Because there's two.

GoLions

Quote from: honza on February 15, 2015, 09:32:21 AM
Quote from: GoLions on February 15, 2015, 03:15:45 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 13, 2015, 06:52:46 PM
Real problem with Fyfey is he isn't cheap, guys that may well outscore him like JPK are cheaper, so it seems crazy to start Nat? :o
I'm sorry, but I believe his name is Josh Kennedy, not JPK. Why are you being a sheep teabs and using an abbreviation/acronym?
Because there's two.
Inside joke ;)