British XV's - 2015 Discussion Thread

[Ringo]

Will start a new thread for Essendon Saga where we can discuss.

[Nige]

keep it simple don't need to delist anyone teams affected just go into a draft for top up players and the topup players get delisted at the end of the year

[Pkbaldy]

Done a few quick scores of some of the elite players of this comp. Some players don't move too much, and some COP it really bad without UP but the extra points gained from not getting clangers. (Didn't add FA averages)

Fyfe 162 (was 166)
Dangerfield 152 (was 160)
Pendles 136 (was 162)
Kennedy 153 (was 160)
Gaff 119 (was 150)
Lewis 135 (was 157)
Mundy 141 (was 156)
Boyd 121 (was 148)

[Rusty00]

Done a few quick scores of some of the elite players of this comp. Some players don't move too much, and some COP it really bad without UP but the extra points gained from not getting clangers. (Didn't add FA averages)

Fyfe 162 (was 166)
Dangerfield 152 (was 160)
Pendles 136 (was 162)
Kennedy 153 (was 160)
Gaff 119 (was 150)
Lewis 135 (was 157)
Mundy 141 (was 156)
Boyd 121 (was 148)

Yeah, I did something similar and it's all the "outside players" like Gaff above and most of the rebounding defenders who suffer the most. (3 players it affects most of all those who played 10 or more games are B Hill, Gibson and Birchall....).

It affected Ruckman and key forwards the least and in a lot of cases their average scores actually rose with these changes.

[Pkbaldy]

Done a few quick scores of some of the elite players of this comp. Some players don't move too much, and some COP it really bad without UP but the extra points gained from not getting clangers. (Didn't add FA averages)

Fyfe 162 (was 166)
Dangerfield 152 (was 160)
Pendles 136 (was 162)
Kennedy 153 (was 160)
Gaff 119 (was 150)
Lewis 135 (was 157)
Mundy 141 (was 156)
Boyd 121 (was 148)

Yeah, I did something similar and it's all the "outside players" like Gaff above and most of the rebounding defenders who suffer the most. (3 players it affects most of all those who played 10 or more games are B Hill, Gibson and Birchall....).

It affected Ruckman and key forwards the least and in a lot of cases their average scores actually rose with these changes.

Yeah, I got Hill... Better off playing an ant haha. Yeah a fair few ruckmen only changed 4-5 points max. Tippett went up from 99 to 102 haha. Boak only went down 10 points, 135 to 125.

[Nige]

players it affects most of all Gibson and Birchall

Yes, more bad news please.

[Spite]

players it affects most of all Gibson and Birchall

Yes, more bad news please.

Hey it could be worse, we added spoils and Gibbo get's like a bonus 15+ ppg! :P

[Spite]

The top up players will only be playing for 1 year, so teams that had them previously wouldn't get first crack. If, however, any of those players get on to an AFL list after the end of this season, then the team that originally had them would get first crack, and not those getting them as replacements this season (if we go down that route).

Just moved this here to continue discussion although everyone so far seems for it.

I think this would be good because whoever had simpkin for example and delisted him would probably deserve to have first crack at him if he gets a lifeline in 2017.

[Ringo]

Will treat it like academy father son.  Any players that you have de-listed and are picked up in future seasons by an afl club, the franchise has the opportunity to redraft them with their final national Draft or Rookie pick depending on the draft taken.  Coaches will have to nominate redrafting player X. This will not apply though to top up players of tjhis year though.

[Ringo]

Ok guys another item for discussion and needs to be resolved reasonably quickly.

Ultimate footy have just released their DPP for the year and they have an additional 13 Players with DPP as per this article.

http://footyprophet.com/exclusive-ultimate-footy-2016-position-update/

These 13 are added to the initial 160 that have already been released so we have 173 players with DPP in UF.

We have already decided that positions in round 1 will stay for the season.  Question we now have to decide is do we use the UF version or try somehow to keep the CD version of 160. Full list can be downloaded from the article.

My thoughts is for simplicity we use the UF list of 173 and lock at Round 1.

Thoughts.

[iZander]

I have no problem with keeping it simple. (also it was stupid Oxley wasn't a defender anyway)

[Pkbaldy]

Ryan Griffen (WS â€" C) â€" Add B

I'm in.

[Rids]

We had Matty James from Footy Prophet on our podcast last week and were discussing the guys who should have had DPP allocated. I dont mind either way tbh but I am totally against any positions that are added in the season being allowed.

[GoLions]

We had Matty James from Footy Prophet on our podcast last week and were discussing the guys who should have had DPP allocated. I dont mind either way tbh but I am totally against any positions that are added in the season being allowed.

Yep

[iZander]

We had Matty James from Footy Prophet on our podcast last week and were discussing the guys who should have had DPP allocated. I dont mind either way tbh but I am totally against any positions that are added in the season being allowed.

yeah agreed, lock them in round 1 :P