Taylor Hunt

Started by whynot102, February 03, 2015, 10:28:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

HotTiges

Quote from: JROO8 on April 01, 2015, 10:05:10 PM
Can't see Hunt on a wing, that's Kamdyn's spot  :P
I reckon he goes to Murphy. Seems as though he's taking Peterd's place, if he can score like him last year he'll be a good pick.

Seems logical he'll goto to Murphy but try and hurt him offensively.. think he's an interesting pick for SC and Tigers

Mat0369

Last time I remember Hunt playing on Murph I think he kicked 3 goals from memory. Just remember 1 game doesn't make a season

RaisyDaisy

Don't mean to sound rude at all, but this is a classic example of people looking for something that isn't there

Cracked a ton in a NAB match and all of sudden he's an option?

This guy is completely irrelevant




tor01doc


tor01doc

If his parents had any sense at all they would have named him iMac.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: tor01doc on April 02, 2015, 01:57:32 AM
If his parents had any sense at all they would have named him iMac.

Haha, as opposed to the traditional Mike? ;)

Ricochet

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 02, 2015, 01:53:34 AM
Don't mean to sound rude at all, but this is a classic example of people looking for something that isn't there

Cracked a ton in a NAB match and all of sudden he's an option?

This guy is completely irrelevant
A guy at his price in defence playing through the middle and small word he won't be tagging... He's very relevant

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Ricochet on April 02, 2015, 08:42:37 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 02, 2015, 01:53:34 AM
Don't mean to sound rude at all, but this is a classic example of people looking for something that isn't there

Cracked a ton in a NAB match and all of sudden he's an option?

This guy is completely irrelevant
A guy at his price in defence playing through the middle and small word he won't be tagging... He's very relevant

Disagree, but if people want 50-70 most weeks with the very odd 90+ for nearly 300k then go for it ;)

Keeper27

Nope.

Rather Jong at that price

Ricochet

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 02, 2015, 09:55:05 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 02, 2015, 08:42:37 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 02, 2015, 01:53:34 AM
Don't mean to sound rude at all, but this is a classic example of people looking for something that isn't there

Cracked a ton in a NAB match and all of sudden he's an option?

This guy is completely irrelevant
A guy at his price in defence playing through the middle and small word he won't be tagging... He's very relevant

Disagree, but if people want 50-70 most weeks with the very odd 90+ for nearly 300k then go for it ;)
There's a chance that he'll play with more freedom than Clancee Pearce and he's looked at as a viable option

Jroo

Quote from: Keeper27 on April 02, 2015, 09:57:33 AM
Nope.

Rather Jong at that price
Well Jong isn't a defender

Bully

Quote from: Ricochet on April 02, 2015, 08:42:37 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 02, 2015, 01:53:34 AM
Don't mean to sound rude at all, but this is a classic example of people looking for something that isn't there

Cracked a ton in a NAB match and all of sudden he's an option?

This guy is completely irrelevant
A guy at his price in defence playing through the middle and small word he won't be tagging... He's very relevant

He's still a fringe player, I'm also sure he'll tag from time to time. Richmond do not have a tagger, they will need one and Hunt is likely to be that player.

reesbr

Proving people wrong tonight ...

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: reesbr on April 02, 2015, 09:10:34 PM
Proving people wrong tonight ...

It's one game

Looking good, but lets if he can do it consistently

Bully

At least he's a fall back option if Goodes spuds it up.