Do you support priority picks for a team with 2 wins or less for the season?

Started by SydneyRox, January 27, 2015, 02:12:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

SydneyRox

At this point I would see the priority picks to be given at the end of the 1st round.

Admins would monitor the issue of tanking and if we thought you guilty, you wouldnt get the priority and would also lose your first round pick.

Please post to let me know you have voted.

SydneyRox


T Dog


powersuperkents

Voted, agreed

I don't see any teams falling into this bracket of less than two wins. But if any team does, it seems necessary that we provide them with more assistance/incentive to rebuild their list (should improve coach retention as well).



Pkbaldy



Football Factory

Yes, we want all coaches to enjoy themselves if a team is struggling they should get priority picks.

Hellopplz

Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on January 27, 2015, 04:56:12 PM
Yes, we want all coaches to enjoy themselves if a team is struggling they should get priority picks.
Given a team can change rapidly over an off season, so perhaps make it more for like 2 seasons of limited wins, then can consider priority picks. Just avoids the tanking discussion as teams winning like less than 4 games over two season means they seriously need help with the list, compared to a team who wins 2 games one season and then can win like 7+ the next (Dublin an example in Worlds for the change, and Dinos in Euros will likely follow same path next year with more wins compared to past two seasons). Just my thoughts on it!

Oh, and haven't voted.

SydneyRox

thanks for the input HP, you are always welcome to comment, and as long as only one of you or nails votes its all good

elephants


SydneyRox


Nige

Tanking is potentially the issue with this and mid-season draft idea.

Not sure what the rules are regarding tanking here, they'd have to be strict and enforced though.

elephants