Player X v Player Y

Started by ben_020285, January 22, 2015, 01:00:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Rusty00

Ward (M5) + Naitanui (R2) + Bennell (F2)                      (would have to have Hamling + McIntosh at D7 & D8 in lieu of N Brown)
Goddard (M5) + Naitanui (R2) + Bartel (F2)
Ward (M5) + Bellchambers (R2) + Bartel/Goddard (F2)    (could upgrade Miller to Brayshaw/Sheed with the left over money)

TexR74

Lycett/C Daniel vs Bellchambers/Duggan

Fid

Swan (F4)  (no ruck cover)

V

Bellchambers (F4)

Torpedo10

Quote from: Rusty00 on April 01, 2015, 04:27:39 PM
Ward (M5) + Naitanui (R2) + Bennell (F2)                      (would have to have Hamling + McIntosh at D7 & D8 in lieu of N Brown)
Goddard (M5) + Naitanui (R2) + Bartel (F2)
Ward (M5) + Bellchambers (R2) + Bartel/Goddard (F2)    (could upgrade Miller to Brayshaw/Sheed with the left over money)
Option 3

Knowall

Quote from: Fid on April 01, 2015, 04:52:27 PM
Swan (F4)  (no ruck cover)

V

Bellchambers (F4)

Swan obviously more points worry about a ruck injury when it happens

Danger, Boak, Higgins, Fwd rookie vs Selwood, Mid Rookie, Birchall, Swan

Torpedo10

Quote from: TexR74 on April 01, 2015, 04:52:01 PM
Lycett/C Daniel vs Bellchambers/Duggan
Belly/Duggan I reckon.

Torpedo10

Quote from: Knowall on April 01, 2015, 04:59:15 PM
Quote from: Fid on April 01, 2015, 04:52:27 PM
Swan (F4)  (no ruck cover)

V

Bellchambers (F4)

Swan obviously more points worry about a ruck injury when it happens

Danger, Boak, Higgins, Fwd rookie vs Selwood, Mid Rookie, Birchall, Swan
Birchall is injured isn't he?

I'd take option two with Kelly over Birch.

Nige


mike

Hi all just wanting some input for my backline . Have decided  to go with either higg or lum . For D4 . appreciate feedback 

Big Mac

Quote from: mike on April 01, 2015, 05:37:41 PM
Hi all just wanting some input for my backline . Have decided  to go with either higg or lum . For D4 . appreciate feedback

Definitely Lumumba

Role change should see him push up onto a wing and into the midfield

swans15

Goodes and Danger vs def rookie sub 150k at D5 and Beams

Bully

Quote from: swans15 on April 01, 2015, 06:27:15 PM
Goodes and Danger vs def rookie sub 150k at D5 and Beams

Goodes and Danger

Ricochet

Quote from: swans15 on April 01, 2015, 06:27:15 PM
Goodes and Danger vs def rookie sub 150k at D5 and Beams
Goodes and Danger

steven3

Fyfe v Selwood if you can only start with one

bowyanger

Quote from: steven3 on April 01, 2015, 07:21:10 PM
Fyfe v Selwood if you can only start with one

Flip a coin - Jelwood I assume your talking about

Maybe Fyfe has a greater home ground advantage

Selwood has had a better pre season

Both carry their team....just work it somehow to get both!