Player X v Player Y

[My Chumps]

Swan & Wells
         v
Salem & Fyfe/JPK

Fyfe and Salem by a stretch. 

Fyfe 125 + Salem 70 = 195

Swan 90 + Wells 85 = 175

Not to mention Fyfe's a captain option.

[bowyanger]

Swan & Wells
         v
Salem & Fyfe/JPK

Fyfe and Salem by a stretch. 

Fyfe 125 + Salem 70 = 195

Swan 90 + Wells 85 = 175

Not to mention Fyfe's a captain option.

Thanks mate

I agree, Ive sacked Swan for now - will see how he goes but having him in my starting fwd line gives me the bad vibes maaan

[My Chumps]

Swan & Wells
         v
Salem & Fyfe/JPK

Fyfe and Salem by a stretch. 

Fyfe 125 + Salem 70 = 195

Swan 90 + Wells 85 = 175

Not to mention Fyfe's a captain option.

Thanks mate

I agree, Ive sacked Swan for now - will see how he goes but having him in my starting fwd line gives me the bad vibes maaan

Yeah I'm miles away from the Swan bandwagon

[Hagebear]

Sam Fisher v Bob Murphy??

[Gigantor]

Sam Fisher v Bob Murphy??

This is the battle for my D3, for me it will come down to money, No GAJ = Bob

[Ricochet]

Sam Fisher v Bob Murphy??

Bob Murphy

[shaker]

Sam Fisher v Bob Murphy??

Two old war horses will both probably score similar both in teams that will cop some hidings ..... Fisher just

[Rusty00]

4 player combo :P

Wells (M5) + Cripps (M7) + Maric (R2) + Franklin (F3)            (Gray is at F1)

Bartel (F1) + Heeney (M7) + Naitanui (R2) + Swan (F3)          (Gray is at M5)


Option 2 gives me an extra premium with Bartel over Wells, however it puts Naitanui and Swan back in my team who I'm not totally convinced with. Also means I need to have Heeney (or a cheaper rookie) in lieu of Cripps who I like better. Having Wells also gives me a better chance to bring Ablett in earlier.

[bowyanger]

4 player combo :P

Wells (M5) + Cripps (M7) + Maric (R2) + Franklin (F3)            (Gray is at F1)

Bartel (F1) + Heeney (M7) + Naitanui (R2) + Swan (F3)          (Gray is at M5)


Option 2 gives me an extra premium with Bartel over Wells, however it puts Naitanui and Swan back in my team who I'm not totally convinced with. Also means I need to have Heeney (or a cheaper rookie) in lieu of Cripps who I like better. Having Wells also gives me a better chance to bring Ablett in earlier.

Dont really like either of them

Id go with Wells (M5) + Cripps (M7) + Maric (R2) + Franklin (F3) if I had to - but Id look at a better combo somehow

[Jackross10]

Newton vs Cripps?

[GCSkiwi]

Newton vs Cripps?

Much of a muchness I think. FWIW I have both, if I had to cull one it would probably be Newton, but that's pretty much solely on NAB form which is totally unreliable...

[Jackross10]

Newton vs Cripps?

Much of a muchness I think. FWIW I have both, if I had to cull one it would probably be Newton, but that's pretty much solely on NAB form which is totally unreliable...

Yes I agree, I want both but simply can't afford them. Don't mind the cheap options anyway. Cripps atm I have

[Corkascrew]

Fyfe + t.mitchell vs s.selwood + r.gray

[Ricochet]

Newton vs Cripps?

Much of a muchness I think. FWIW I have both, if I had to cull one it would probably be Newton, but that's pretty much solely on NAB form which is totally unreliable...

Yes I agree, I want both but simply can't afford them. Don't mind the cheap options anyway. Cripps atm I have

Newton would have slightly better JS

[auscoyote]

Swan vs Steven