Player X v Player Y

[Mat0369]

I don't think he will go 95 but 90 is realistic. I think Dal is the more dangerous player so he will attract a tag first but he will score between 70 and 100 each week so maybe 85 is on the money.

[Bully]

I don't think he will go 95 but 90 is realistic. I think Dal is the more dangerous player so he will attract a tag first but he will score between 70 and 100 each week so maybe 85 is on the money.

He scored 29 tons between 2011 & 2013. Those estimations are selling him short.

[Big Mac]

I don't think he will go 95 but 90 is realistic. I think Dal is the more dangerous player so he will attract a tag first but he will score between 70 and 100 each week so maybe 85 is on the money.

He scored 29 tons between 2011 & 2013. Those estimations are selling him short.

He's not going to come back and be just as good as he was back then

[Bully]

I don't think he will go 95 but 90 is realistic. I think Dal is the more dangerous player so he will attract a tag first but he will score between 70 and 100 each week so maybe 85 is on the money.

He scored 29 tons between 2011 & 2013. Those estimations are selling him short.

He's not going to come back and be just as good as he was back then

He's looked good during the preseason, last week he notched up 90 points with 72% TOG. I honestly can't see him dropping off from his career average based on the evidence of the past month.

It's interesting that all and sundry are giving Swan the benefit of the doubt yet are dismissing other players in a similar situation.

[Mat0369]

He's looked good during the preseason, last week he notched up 90 points with 72% TOG. I honestly can't see him dropping off from his career average based on the evidence of the past month.

It's interesting that all and sundry are giving Swan the benefit of the doubt yet are dismissing other players in a similar situation.

The thing is the less TOG could carry on into the season. North are thinking finals, they will want Wells to have an impact and could manage his minutes so he is cherry ripe come September. I am not saying he is a bad pick but I think 85-90 is more realistic. He will have poor games and score 70 odd in those and then he will have the games where he tears it apart and scores over 100. If you take the highs and lows into account it will work out to 85-90

[Big Mac]

I don't think he will go 95 but 90 is realistic. I think Dal is the more dangerous player so he will attract a tag first but he will score between 70 and 100 each week so maybe 85 is on the money.

He scored 29 tons between 2011 & 2013. Those estimations are selling him short.

He's not going to come back and be just as good as he was back then

He's looked good during the preseason, last week he notched up 90 points with 72% TOG. I honestly can't see him dropping off from his career average based on the evidence of the past month.

It's interesting that all and sundry are giving Swan the benefit of the doubt yet are dismissing other players in a similar situation.

Swan averaged 122 from 2011 - 2013. I have him in my team on the basis that he can average 25 points under that. Hardly the same situation

[bowyanger]

Swan & Wells
         v
Salem & Fyfe/JPK

[Bully]

I don't think he will go 95 but 90 is realistic. I think Dal is the more dangerous player so he will attract a tag first but he will score between 70 and 100 each week so maybe 85 is on the money.

He scored 29 tons between 2011 & 2013. Those estimations are selling him short.

He's not going to come back and be just as good as he was back then

He's looked good during the preseason, last week he notched up 90 points with 72% TOG. I honestly can't see him dropping off from his career average based on the evidence of the past month.

It's interesting that all and sundry are giving Swan the benefit of the doubt yet are dismissing other players in a similar situation.

Swan averaged 122 from 2011 - 2013. I have him in my team on the basis that he can average 25 points under that. Hardly the same situation

Swan hasn't scored a ton in nearly a year, aside from the injury issues Buckley is about as reliable as Crazy Vossy. I have Swan but have contemplated removing him on many occasions, I'm far from convinced he will even manage to average 100.

[Torpedo10]

I don't think he will go 95 but 90 is realistic. I think Dal is the more dangerous player so he will attract a tag first but he will score between 70 and 100 each week so maybe 85 is on the money.

He scored 29 tons between 2011 & 2013. Those estimations are selling him short.

He's not going to come back and be just as good as he was back then

He's looked good during the preseason, last week he notched up 90 points with 72% TOG. I honestly can't see him dropping off from his career average based on the evidence of the past month.

It's interesting that all and sundry are giving Swan the benefit of the doubt yet are dismissing other players in a similar situation.

Swan averaged 122 from 2011 - 2013. I have him in my team on the basis that he can average 25 points under that. Hardly the same situation

Swan hasn't scored a ton in nearly a year, aside from the injury issues Buckley is about as reliable as Crazy Vossy. I have Swan but have contemplated removing him on many occasions, I'm far from convinced he will even manage to average 100.

You'd reckon he could make 90 though at least. Is that good enough?

[Bully]

I don't think he will go 95 but 90 is realistic. I think Dal is the more dangerous player so he will attract a tag first but he will score between 70 and 100 each week so maybe 85 is on the money.

He scored 29 tons between 2011 & 2013. Those estimations are selling him short.

He's not going to come back and be just as good as he was back then

He's looked good during the preseason, last week he notched up 90 points with 72% TOG. I honestly can't see him dropping off from his career average based on the evidence of the past month.

It's interesting that all and sundry are giving Swan the benefit of the doubt yet are dismissing other players in a similar situation.

Swan averaged 122 from 2011 - 2013. I have him in my team on the basis that he can average 25 points under that. Hardly the same situation

Swan hasn't scored a ton in nearly a year, aside from the injury issues Buckley is about as reliable as Crazy Vossy. I have Swan but have contemplated removing him on many occasions, I'm far from convinced he will even manage to average 100.

You'd reckon he could make 90 though at least. Is that good enough?

90 would be a bare pass mark but it means an additional trade, not sure I would be over the moon with that scenario.

[Mat0369]

You'd reckon he could make 90 though at least. Is that good enough?

Simply put no

Gray
Jimmy
Buddy
Lids
BJ
Martin
Harley
Boomer

All the guys listed above you would expect to average over 100

There are bunch of other guys that might also push the 95 bracket like Rough, NRoo, Ryder, Hoff and a few others.

Those guys are all likely to average over 100. You could be better off taking a risk on Taylor Adams or Tom Mitchell who are cheaper and could also average around that 90 mark

[Nathaneph]

Cockatoo vs Cripps vs Van Berlo?

[Big Mac]

Cockatoo vs Cripps vs Van Berlo?

If all 3 get named, Cripps

[GoLions]

Cockatoo vs Cripps vs Van Berlo?

If all 3 get named, Cripps

If all 3 get named, I may start all of them haha

[Big Mac]

Cockatoo vs Cripps vs Van Berlo?

If all 3 get named, Cripps

If all 3 get named, I may start all of them haha

Yeh I'll probably do the same :P