i5s General Discussion

kilbluff1985 · January 10, 2015, 07:03:21 PM

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on January 10, 2015, 06:59:55 PM
Thoughts here.

Thinking so that some good players can fall into next years drafts.

Should people nominate there 3 keepers at the start of the season?

any LTI could really hurt though like if one of your keeps does an ACL we could make exceptions for this though

JBs-Hawks · January 10, 2015, 07:34:27 PM

That would just be part of the risk you take, cant make it too easy for everyone.

nrich102 · January 10, 2015, 08:22:17 PM

I think keepers should be selected at the end of the season.

nrich102 · January 11, 2015, 08:24:27 AM

All the drafts should be updated.

ossie85 · January 11, 2015, 08:28:29 AM

Quote from: nrich102 on January 11, 2015, 08:24:27 AM
All the drafts should be updated.

cheers nrich

Ricochet · January 11, 2015, 09:50:02 AM

What about just 2 keepers? You still keep your favourite two and gives a bit more strength to the draft pool

nas · January 11, 2015, 10:54:31 AM

Quote from: upthemaidens on January 08, 2015, 04:00:00 PM
Quote from: LF on January 08, 2015, 03:47:39 PM
So are we going to be keeping 3 players still?
Or will it depend on how next season will work
Coaches picked on the assumption they were keeping three players, so don't think that should change.

GoLions · January 11, 2015, 11:39:59 AM

Quote from: Ricochet on January 11, 2015, 09:50:02 AM
What about just 2 keepers? You still keep your favourite two and gives a bit more strength to the draft pool

I think 2 could maybe work if there's no trading. 3 won't work. 1 or 2 keepers should be fine I think without trading.

Mr.Craig · January 11, 2015, 12:48:58 PM

I'd rather 2.

nrich102 · January 11, 2015, 12:52:08 PM

I like 3. It gives you more wriggle room, and lets you hold onto a player who may not be in your best 5, but will be in the future.

GoLions · January 11, 2015, 12:53:15 PM

Quote from: nrich102 on January 11, 2015, 12:52:08 PM
I like 3. It gives you more wriggle room, and lets you hold onto a player who may not be in your best 5, but will be in the future.

Then how are the teams with poor top-end premos ever going to improve? You would pretty much have to tank for early draft picks, thus making the competition not enjoyable.

RaisyDaisy · January 11, 2015, 12:53:24 PM

What about just 1?

That means that we will all get a chance to actually draft good players

GoLions · January 11, 2015, 12:54:50 PM

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on January 11, 2015, 12:53:24 PM
What about just 1?

That means that we will all get a chance to actually draft good players

Yeah I'm fine with 1 or 2. My only concern with 1 is that it might make it a lot more difficult for teams to actually separate themselves from the rest, so maybe 2 would be best.

nrich102 · January 11, 2015, 12:58:28 PM

One makes it feel like a totally different team altogether. I think we should have up to 3, but with restrictions on who you can take (Say one 100+ player).

Dont think 1 would work, but I'd be open for 2.

RaisyDaisy · January 11, 2015, 01:01:36 PM

What if age and or scoring was bought into it?

Say we keep 2, but one of them has to be 21 years old or less and 1 is your highest scorer

Probably over complicating it, but just throwing ideas out there :)