Martin or Bellchambers?

Started by bmac25, January 04, 2015, 08:18:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

bmac25

Totally different I know, but I have one spot left in my fwd line.  I think Martin could have a breakout year, but belchambers is also good value and gives me versatility in the ruck.  Thoughts?

Money Shot

Quote from: bmac25 on January 04, 2015, 08:18:25 PM
Totally different I know, but I have one spot left in my fwd line.  I think Martin could have a breakout year, but belchambers is also good value and gives me versatility in the ruck.  Thoughts?
To be honest I think Belly will score better anyways.

WizzFizz

Martin has avg 56 in his career

Belly has avg 86 once in his career

Belly is proven and has ruck dpp

belly>martin

eaglesman

I think Martin will score more but would rather a rookie
But if you are going to pick one then belly for the ruck coverage

nrich102

Would have to go with Bellchambers out of those 2.

crowls

Quote from: eaglesman on January 04, 2015, 09:13:59 PM
I think Martin will score more but would rather a rookie
But if you are going to pick one then belly for the ruck coverage

If need ruck coverage then Belly,  if not then T Mitch or similar.