Will Langford

[The Priest]

Is he ready for a break out year? or will hawthorn use him as a tagger?

His NAB scores were 94, 91 and 96.

In his last two finals last year he has 111 and 113.

Priced at $393,700, will he go up to around 500 and then maybe an upgrade to a premium, can he be a premium?

[shaker]

His scores look good but an awkward price for say a M5 got caught with Liam Shiels last year where he made very little or no money in the first part of the season then got injured , not for me .

[muggle25]

I was on Jackson Macrae from the start last year - I like speculative picks - and like Langford - whether I will pick him or Neale is what I'm weighing up at the moment.

[The Priest]

I think Lauchie Neale is a no brainer.

[tor01doc]

Heath Shaw has proven he is a no brainer, but I am picking him anyway.

[FactHunt]

Heath Shaw has proven he is a no brainer, but I am picking him anyway.

Haha... in fine form as always doc.
I've got him in too, I can't wait for one of his brain fades ::)

[Ricochet]

Heath Shaw has proven he is a no brainer, but I am picking him anyway.

hahaha.


At 393k Langford needs to average 101+ just to make you 150k.

Can't see that happening

[The Priest]

You clearly don't know what 'no brainer' means or what I meant by it.

It means picking Lauchie Neale requires no mental effort, he is a lock.

Heath shaw also a lock.

I think Langford can average 101.

[DoctorRush]

You clearly don't know what 'no brainer' means or what I meant by it.

It means picking Lauchie Neale requires no mental effort, he is a lock.

Heath shaw also a lock.

I think Langford can average 101.

Think you read his post verbatim Priest.

Pretty sure he meant Shaw doesn't use his brain "no brainer"

[Gigantor]

You clearly don't know what 'no brainer' means or what I meant by it.

It means picking Lauchie Neale requires no mental effort, he is a lock.

Heath shaw also a lock.

I think Langford can average 101.

Jordan Lewis was the only Hawk to average over 100 last year, I cant see that changing

[Big Mac]

You clearly don't know what 'no brainer' means or what I meant by it.

It means picking Lauchie Neale requires no mental effort, he is a lock.

Heath shaw also a lock.

I think Langford can average 101.

Fair enough, but what makes you think that?

I can't find a good reason for him to increase his average that much

[FactHunt]

You clearly don't know what 'no brainer' means or what I meant by it.

It means picking Lauchie Neale requires no mental effort, he is a lock.

Heath shaw also a lock.

I think Langford can average 101.

Jordan Lewis was the only Hawk to average over 100 last year, I cant see that changing

I think Smitch will go 100 again.
Gibbo could at a push, but seriously dependant on his roll with all their talls (I don't think he will).
I wouldn't back Langford in for 100+

[Ricochet]

I think Langford can average 101.

Back yourself in mate. Can't see it happening myself