The Pav - Hold or Fold?

Started by BT, May 19, 2014, 08:10:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

BT

So without major issues this week I've got a few luxury trades. Pretty keen on getting rid of spud Georgiou with one, and then it's out of Pav or Crouch for the other one. But while Pav helps me field more this week, he has a ridiculous run coming up, of Dogs, Crows, Tigers, Lions, Eagles, Demons, Giants, Saints and Blues for his next 9.

109, 65.33, 98.67, 95, 60.67, 94, 92, 72.33 and 103.67 are his last 3 game averages against each of his next 9 opponents.

My question is: worth keeping Pav and going Crouch to Selwood, or offload Pavlich to a guy like Tex this week?

All help appreciated  :)

HBTD22

I've folded. Had to bring back Danger this week.

pommyadam

Quote from: BT on May 19, 2014, 08:10:57 PM
So without major issues this week I've got a few luxury trades. Pretty keen on getting rid of spud Georgiou with one, and then it's out of Pav or Crouch for the other one. But while Pav helps me field more this week, he has a ridiculous run coming up, of Dogs, Crows, Tigers, Lions, Eagles, Demons, Giants, Saints and Blues for his next 9.

109, 65.33, 98.67, 95, 60.67, 94, 92, 72.33 and 103.67 are his last 3 game averages against each of his next 9 opponents.

My question is: worth keeping Pav and going Crouch to Selwood, or offload Pavlich to a guy like Tex this week?

All help appreciated  :)

how? Freo have the bye this week
and looking at their season stats, Freo's top FWD scorer against these opponent will average around 85
now, whether that will be Pav or not (and you're happy with mid 80s), is up to you

BT

Quote from: pommyadam on May 20, 2014, 09:39:49 AM
Quote from: BT on May 19, 2014, 08:10:57 PM
But while Pav helps me field more this week, he has a ridiculous run

how? Freo have the bye this week
and looking at their season stats, Freo's top FWD scorer against these opponent will average around 85
now, whether that will be Pav or not (and you're happy with mid 80s), is up to you

As in trading him. Probably should have made that a bit clearer