The important questions post round 1...

[jvalles69]

Well for me anyway!  ;)

What I'm leaning towards is in red.

1. Shiels, Daisy or Mcrae? Shiels

2. Dahlhaus, Zorko, Gunston or Darling? Dahlhaus with Zorko a close second

3. Jacobs or Mumford? Jacobs

4. McDonald or KK if he plays? KK if he's named round 2, feel he will score more than Luke and doesn't make sense to have two rookies in the backline priced at 250k

5. Luke Parker or Tom Mitchell? Parker

[me]

cox is a must have, looked great yesterday, will most likely crack 150 against jake spencer

theres just so many options, might see some really different teams

tyson, dunstan, polec are all must haves as well, going to generate some serious coin

im seriously considering the hoff, think port could dominate this season, and if they do he'll be in the thick of it - risky though

[jamfrank]

cox is a must have, looked great yesterday, will most likely crack 150 against jake spencer

theres just so many options, might see some really different teams

tyson, dunstan, polec are all must haves as well, going to generate some serious coin

im seriously considering the hoff, think port could dominate this season, and if they do he'll be in the thick of it - risky though

Not sure about Cox long term. The eagles belted WBD last night, and if Cox was the solo ruckman he probably would have made 150. At the moment he's sharing the ruck load with 3 other blokes. As soon as they come up against a stronger team who can actually man up all the tall blokes running around for the eagles, I reckon all three ruckman's scores will be lower, because they have to divide the number of hit out points by three. Really poor and lazy marking from the WB let Cox pick up a lot of easy posessions. Reckon you're better off saving $100k and picking a solo ruckman like Jacobs or Mumford.