Watson vs Cotchin

Started by Judd Magic, March 04, 2014, 06:01:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Judd Magic

Quote from: HotTiges on March 04, 2014, 10:39:32 PM
Settle down JM you would have used 14 trades by the time round 8 comes around  ;)

Hah!  ;D

Trying to slow down a bit this year trade wise and still have a few for finals.  ;)

I will still however trade aggressively at the start to get the best team I can as quickly as possible.

Its the way I roll.  8)

Nige

Cotch, no bias I swear.  :P

tor01doc

Watson averaging 118 if you take out clavicle game.

Hard to top. Better bye than Cotchin

Get Pendles and Watson and Ablett and you will start the season flying.

Judd Magic

Quote from: tor01doc on March 04, 2014, 10:54:39 PM
Watson averaging 118 if you take out clavicle game.

Hard to top. Better bye than Cotchin

Get Pendles and Watson and Ablett and you will start the season flying.

I Think a midfield of Ablett, Watson, Rockliff, Libba and Beams is still pretty handy without Pendles though.

Just think it makes more sense picking up Pendles after his bye where hopefully he has dropped in price due to Collingwoods hard draw up until the byes.  8)

tor01doc

Nice mids but sex it up with Pendles.

Grufflez

I have had Watson since SC opening but it's hard to pick a bloke likely to be suspended mid year, I salute those with balls big enough to still pick him...Cotchin or anyone else for me.

tor01doc

Really?!  :o :o

So Essendon will play their VFl team from mid season?

Quick, put your house on Essendon VFL team getting wooden spoon.

reesbr

Would you still pick Joel Selwood even after his injury troubled pre season?

dano_monaz

^

That's what I'm thinking
Team was set until selwood hurt his hammy :(

Jackross10

I am going for JPK. My risk for the year :)

AaronKirk

Quote from: Grufflez on March 04, 2014, 11:02:30 PM
I have had Watson since SC opening but it's hard to pick a bloke likely to be suspended mid year, I salute those with balls big enough to still pick him...Cotchin or anyone else for me.

We are still months away from ASADA completing their review into the evidence, then they have to decide whether they have enough evidence to stick, than if that is the case they have to give out the infraction notices, than the AFL tribunal have to review the evidence and recommend a charge, than the hearings start. This was stepped out by Aurora Andruska the old head of ASADA during the senate enquiry

Won't be finished either way during the season unfortunately and i'm an Essendon supporter and just want this finished with regardless of the outcome.

From an SC perspective I hope everyone steers away from Watson so I have a POD :P