Which Round 10 Premium Midfielder will score best up until the byes

[Baggers2012]

Watson - 120
Jack - 115
Rockliff - 115
Fyfe - 110-115
Barlow - 110-115
Steven - 105-110

[GoLions]

:)
Out of those Watson, and why not keep 90k over in case Pendles starts killing it.   Cheers.           ;)

But the whole point of saving the 90k would be to use it elsewhere, otherwise you're just losing points?

I would say; Rockliff > Watson > Barlow > Fyfe > Steven > Jack

But really think it's in your best interest to start Pendles :)

[ben_020285]

:)
Out of those Watson, and why not keep 90k over in case Pendles starts killing it.   Cheers.           ;)

But the whole point of saving the 90k would be to use it elsewhere, otherwise you're just losing points?

I would say; Rockliff > Watson > Barlow > Fyfe > Steven > Jack

But really think it's in your best interest to start Pendles :)

Yeah I am very nervous about not starting with Pendlebury but tell me which group of players will score more points over the first 7 rounds:

A. Pendlebury, Simpson and Grimes or

B. Rockliff, Mitchell and Hanley?

[aussied]

the game is about scoring as many points as possible however the backing behind the end game is cash generation is it not?

i think the question people should be asking is how much money could i make and will their price drop or increase. 

i don't see much value being achieved from pendles in the first few rounds. where as someone like scott selwood will make an easy buck with his early draw which will allow to easily upgrade and save alot of money in the same time.

IMO people need to step back and look at the bigger picture. 

out of the lot rockcliff is my pick

[GoLions]

the game is about scoring as many points as possible however the backing behind the end game is cash generation is it not?

i think the question people should be asking is how much money could i make and will their price drop or increase. 

i don't see much value being achieved from pendles in the first few rounds. where as someone like scott selwood will make an easy buck with his early draw which will allow to easily upgrade and save alot of money in the same time.

IMO people need to step back and look at the bigger picture. 

out of the lot rockcliff is my pick

If they are a keeper then how much cash they make means flower all as you won't be trading them at all during the year (except for injuries).

:)
Out of those Watson, and why not keep 90k over in case Pendles starts killing it.   Cheers.           ;)

But the whole point of saving the 90k would be to use it elsewhere, otherwise you're just losing points?

I would say; Rockliff > Watson > Barlow > Fyfe > Steven > Jack

But really think it's in your best interest to start Pendles :)

Yeah I am very nervous about not starting with Pendlebury but tell me which group of players will score more points over the first 7 rounds:

A. Pendlebury, Simpson and Grimes or

B. Rockliff, Mitchell and Hanley?

Pendles, Simpson, Swallow would be ideal IMO

[Vinny]

You need at least one of Ablett and Pendles and all in all at least 2 of Ablett, Pendles, Selwood, Rocky.

Then you got Beams who is a must at his price based on his potential.

It's really that one mid spot where I reckon it's up for grabs between guys like Murphy, Fyfe, Watson, Griffen etc.

[Woppa15]

I'm having the same dilemma.
Starting Ablett, Beams, Cotchin. All Rnd 8 bye, don't want to start another.
I had Ziebell, then Fyfe, then Watson, then Jack and now Steven. I just can't settle on an M3 with a Rnd 9 or 10 bye, preferably Rnd 10.

Doing my head in!!!!  >:(

[ben_020285]

It is a tough one.

I've currently got Rockliff in there as I think he has the greatest potentail to consistently go big. Playing as a pure mid this year I reckon that a 120 average isn't out of reach.

[tor01doc]

Stevens/ Barlow

I'll never understand why people continue to say Stevens. you never hear people say Pendleburys or Cotchins?

Steven.

not having a go at you mate it's just one thing that really annoys me!

if it was Koby Stevens I'd understand

He's right.

Brads makes a good point.