Will Langford....

[Woppa15]

Has shown a bit through the NAB and with the severe drought in Rookie defenders this year could very well be a viable option.

My concern however is for those who already have Mitchell and Suckers can we afford to have a third Hawk in defence? Certainly not come bye time! I know it's only speculation but what are the chances he will not get enough games to increase in value enough to be a successful downgrade......

If you can't get him out before the byes we'd be in all sorts of strife

[hellsg8]

LOCKED AT D8.

[Bully]

LOCKED AT D8.

For me too, particularly if Cutler or any other rookies don't materialise. Loved his game against the Kangas, looks a player.

[sammy123]

I've put him in now. KK made way for him. Should get bamed played 2 great NAB games

[shaker]

It's what everyone has been hoping a cheap defender lets hope he gets named round 1 , he could end up the most picked player in SC if he is

[Bully]

It's what everyone has been hoping a cheap defender lets hope he gets named round 1 , he could end up the most picked player in SC if he is

I may even pick him if not named, he seems the most likely to see senior action out of all the rookies (McDonald aside).

[Grufflez]

He is in my team if named R1

[Keeper27]

looking like a good choice, still it comes down to Rnd 1

[Ringo]

He will be strongly considered if named Round 1.  For those worried about the byes bear in mind Hawks have Round 9 bye so he may be able to be upgraded to those with Round 8 byes.

[Footyrulz]

Won't play guys.

Maybe a downgrade option if they get injuries later in the season.

[Grazz]

Cant see how he gets a go in the Hawks line up.