STRUCTURAL COMBO QUESTION!

[felsty]

Might be easier with my team posted..

D: McVeigh, Mitchell, Hodge, Suckling, McDonald, Laidler (Thompson, Fuller)
M: Ablett, Pendlebury, Rockliff, Beams, Thomas, Polec, Michie, Ellis (Dunstan, Crouch)
R: Grundy, Sandilands (Derickx, Nankervis)
F: Dangerfield, Martin, Franklin, Zorko, Hawkins, Markworth (Garlett, Kennedy-Harris)
$157.6k remaining

Just a bit cautious about none of these fwd and def rookies getting named Round 1 and trying to put in a few premiums up either end of the ground. What do people think? Is it a year when the mids can be kept dry with the amount of good rookie players available?

[GCSkiwi]

Wait and see. If Garlett named round 1, option A. If not, option B, though consider someone other than Missy... not totally sold on his value yet

edit - I do think you are two forward heavy and back light though... but this isn't RMS

[Ricochet]

Definitely option 2 mate. Otherwise you are fielding two rookies in defence and Tyson (or another similar priced rook) is pretty good value at this stage. Although I do want to see more of Tyson first.

[colmullet]

im going with option B structure in the middle with Beams and Thomas M3 & M4, just seems like the only really decent JS & money making rooks at the moment all reside in the mids

[Grufflez]

Yeah playing rookies dictate team structure.

[felsty]

The big issues for me are that if it's not the rookies we don't have available to us, it's the back and forward premiums that we can't put a finger on yet as to who will be a top 6-8 in their position.. It's a tough issue to overcome. I agree with everyone that all the good looking rookie prospects are in the mids.. So much to think about!