Most Fantasy Relevant Team Of 2014

Started by Mr.Craig, December 19, 2013, 05:51:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Toga

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 23, 2013, 10:14:47 AM
really thought Tigers would be right up there

I wanted to mention us but didn't because I thought I would cop shower for it :P

Cotchin & Martin both locked in my side, Deledio & Miles could well feature at some point.

tbagrocks

Quote from: CrowsFan on December 23, 2013, 09:20:59 AM
What have you been smoking noz? Hartlett a premium? :o

A midfielder who averaged 82 last year cannot be considered a premium by anyone's standards!

Then you are saying Pittard, Cassisi and White will improve their averages from mid 50's to 80-90, an increase of at least 25 or so. Then expecting O'Shea, Broady 70, Gray, Wines and wines to put on another 10 points to their averages.

Where is all this improvement coming from?? This is a more bias post than anything tbag writes!
He's just trying too steal my awards :P  Although my bias is just too bridge the gap from the stubborn Vics! :o

Ok reason for my post. Can't believe the Hammer didn't retain dpp, bit of a joke So as a pure mid, no he is not worth a go!

Also voted for the Doggies!

Noz

#17
Quote from: CrowsFan on December 23, 2013, 09:20:59 AM
What have you been smoking noz? Hartlett a premium? :o

A midfielder who averaged 82 last year cannot be considered a premium by anyone's standards!

Then you are saying Pittard, Cassisi and White will improve their averages from mid 50's to 80-90, an increase of at least 25 or so. Then expecting O'Shea, Broady 70, Gray, Wines and wines to put on another 10 points to their averages.

Where is all this improvement coming from?? This is a more bias post than anything tbag writes!

White averaged 75 unsubbed last year so its not hard to see a +5 improvement on a guy who we recruited to play

Pittard will break out next year he was never really recovered from his injury which hampered his entire season.

Cassisi only played 10 games this year due to injury if he can remain injury free and has a good preseason he could get back to his best

Gray spent most of the year trying to regain match fitness after coming back from a broken leg after the bye he averaged 80

O'Shea entering his fourth playing year and now in our best 22 why can't he improve at only 21 years of age

Wines slowed down towards the end of the season as all first year players do, Why can't he improve his average his one of the best young midfielders in the game another full pre season under will be raring to go next year

Broady spent the year in the back line due to our inexperienced defenders and was one of our better players throughout the year he might be given some more midfield time as our younger backs slowly get more games averaged 80 playing in a midfield/defence role in 2012 if given more mid time he could reproduce them numbers.

CrowsFan

Still didn't answer how Hartlett is a premium

Noz

Quote from: CrowsFan on December 23, 2013, 09:07:42 PM
Still didn't answer how Hartlett is a premium

Maybe his not at premium level yet but he will be at the end of next season

Anything else you care to discuss CF?

Justin Bieber

I just don't get how every player in the team can improve? They can't score 2700 points per game

strikes91


Money

Is 5 Collingwood players too many? I think if they're reasonably spread so it should be okay, 1 down back, 1 up forward, 3 in the guts (only R8 byes)

Memphistopheles

Certainly not the guys the AFL Dreamers have in their Top 50.

Hawkins at #9. He might be relevant for SC but not for Fantasy next season. Even at a cheaper price there are way better options around and I can't see any/many starting with him.

Mr.Craig

Quote from: Memphistopheles on January 23, 2014, 08:23:36 PM
Certainly not the guys the AFL Dreamers have in their Top 50.

Hawkins at #9. He might be relevant for SC but not for Fantasy next season. Even at a cheaper price there are way better options around and I can't see any/many starting with him.

... ???

mezzoculo

My selection was Dees and Saints.
Melbourne midfield has spots available to a underpriced players while St Kilda are 'rebuilding' and have a few possible cashcows on their list.

jimmytigs

speaking for draft comps only ive now done 15 drafts,13 live online & 2 autopick & this is how it stands

essendon 35 picks 10 players(chappy 8 howlett 7 ryder 6 watson 4)
freo 34 picks 8 players(duffield 9 fyfe 6 sylvia/neale 5 sandi 4)
sydney 25 9 players(parker 7 hannebery 6)
melbourne 24 8 players(vince 8 terlich 6)
wce 23 8 players(naitanui/selwood 6 ellis 4)
doggies 21 8 players(liberatore 9 dickson 3)
pies 20 7 players(harry 8 grundy 4)
roos 19 11 players(goldy 5)
saints 19 8 players(fisher 6 hayes/geary 4)
port 18 4 players(gray 8 wingard 6 polec 3)
lions 17 3 players(zorko 7 adcock 6 leuey 4)
blues 17 8 players(walker/everitt 4)
cats 16 6 players(kelly 5 mackie 4 bartel 3)
suns 14 5 players(swallow 9)
hawks 14 8 players(mitchell 5)
crows 13 5 players(danger 5 betts 4)
tigers 12 6 players(ellis 4 martin 3)
giants 8 6 players(greene/smith 2)

i did a few ultimate footy drafts first & north & freo players were all the rage,but in real dreamteam & supercoach the bombers & freo have shot clear,i have nominated 11 premium mids(beams swan pendles watson fyfe jelwood steviej gaj sselwood griffen & libba)& danger who i target as many of them as i can,then i target 1 or 2 rucks depending on how fast they are being picked,then i go after the premium dpp backs & forwards then back to rest of the mids,in category drafts i snaffle guys like howlett dickson everitt & betts towards the end as 2 of them are goal kickers,everitt is a back who will kick goals & may get 20+ possies a game & howlett is a dpp c/f who will get goals & possies,that explains their high numbers as well as grundy & sandi for hitouts,when i get to mids at the end there is usually a cluster including ellis kelly hayes vince,there not a bad bunch when ive loaded up the other lines & beggars cant be choosers

hope this helps answer the topic question,btw essendon is the team i hate most,so their is no bias here when i pick

owenbond007