Cyril vs Pav vs Chappy

[TeeJay]

Let the polls begin!

All of these guns are similarly priced and all have enormous upside. They are also all an enormous risk!
Which one would you start?
One of them will be my F4 and the bye isn't a concern.

[Jroo]

Rioli has the most upside, but Pav seems like the safest choice, so I'll go with Pav.

[Dayze]

Think chappy is being severely under estimated.
Good poll tho. Huge upside and risk with all three.
Cyril feels like suicide tho so going to resist this year.
Probably pav> chappy> Cyril.
Although I imagine most will put chappy last.

[specky92]

I feel like it's almost inevitable that Cyril will miss more than 4 games, Toss of the coin for Pav and Chappy but I feel like Chappy has a point to prove so I voted for him

[Nige]

Don't think I'll be getting any of them.

If I was, would probably go the Pav just ahead of Chappy.

[quinny88]

Man that's tough, that's really tough
Put injuries aside and assume they all play the entire season. Who do you pick then?  :o
Still no easier! I honestly can't decide.

Chappy at a new club makes him a bit of an unknown. Slight risk of being the sub maybe? Absloute gun though
Pav no risk of sub and was in amazing touch in 2012. Ageing though. Can he go 100+ Again?
Rioli only needs to touch it 10 times for a ton. Would be a lock every year if not for those hammys.

I don't know. I'm getting a headache

[Footyrulz]

Dont like any of them but pav the best.

Rioli is out round 1, and massively innjury prone.

Chappy is old and massively injury prone.

Pav is old and his scores have dropped off but has some upside.

[quinny88]

Dont like any of them but pav the best.

Rioli is out round 1, and massively innjury prone.

Chappy is old and massively injury prone.

Pav is old and his scores have dropped off but has some upside.

Why is Rioli out round 1? Reported? That makes it a bit easier!

[GoLions]

IMO Pav>Chappy>Rioli

I wouldn't be picking more than 1 of these guys to start with, and if I did start one, it would definitely be Pav without a doubt.

[ubeaut]

Pav by a country mile. look how well he did when Freo were bottom 8. Ok he's older but will mostly play forward where he scores better anyway. Locked for that price. Underated player.

[theta]

Im a little surprised Pav is ahead in the pole by so much given he is becoming a little more injury prone/long in the tooth.  On scores he deserves the votes, but Im not confident he will return to his past durability.
Also Freo might be careful with him and hold him back from a few more games than usual.

17 games.

105

[Jroo]

Im a little surprised Pav is ahead in the pole by so much given he is becoming a little more injury prone/long in the tooth.  On scores he deserves the votes, but Im not confident he will return to his past durability.
Also Freo might be careful with him and hold him back from a few more games than usual.

17 games.

105

Pav injury prone? I think Chappy and Cyril are more injury prone.
Also 17 games and 105, who is that prediction for?

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 ??? ???
Rioli being out rd. 1 coz of suspension will almost certainly rule him out of most teams. So I'll go for him as a POD and a player with still a lot to prove. Don't believe that he's gone anywhere close to reaching his full potential and I'm willing to risk him injury wise and carry him through rd. 1 and hope like hell that I'm not kicking my own arse.   ;)

[theta]

Im a little surprised Pav is ahead in the pole by so much given he is becoming a little more injury prone/long in the tooth.  On scores he deserves the votes, but Im not confident he will return to his past durability.
Also Freo might be careful with him and hold him back from a few more games than usual.

17 games.

105

Pav injury prone? I think Chappy and Cyril are more injury prone.
Also 17 games and 105, who is that prediction for?

After watching him last year my gut says his days of durability are over, just my opinion.

I still think the Pav > Chappy > Rioli is right, I'm just a tad surprised the poll is so strongly in Pav's favour, thought he might have 9-10 votes, with a couple more for Chaps and Cyril, mainly because I think Pav has new durability issues and Freo will take a cautious approach to him while their window is open.

If Im wrong about Pav then the votes would be about right.

I always thought Chappy's hamstrings were shot, but he proved me wrong in 2010, 11, 12 playing 20-21 games in each, but like pav he fell away last year.  I think he'll play 18-19 this year (yes it's optimistic) but will spend more time in the 50, so scores will be more reliant on goals therefore more inconsistency.

Pav - 17 games, 105

Chappy - 18 games, 100

Cyril - No idea, I've given up trying to predict him.

[Jroo]

Im a little surprised Pav is ahead in the pole by so much given he is becoming a little more injury prone/long in the tooth.  On scores he deserves the votes, but Im not confident he will return to his past durability.
Also Freo might be careful with him and hold him back from a few more games than usual.

17 games.

105

Pav injury prone? I think Chappy and Cyril are more injury prone.
Also 17 games and 105, who is that prediction for?

After watching him last year my gut says his days of durability are over, just my opinion.

I still think the Pav > Chappy > Rioli is right, I'm just a tad surprised the poll is so strongly in Pav's favour, thought he might have 9-10 votes, with a couple more for Chaps and Cyril, mainly because I think Pav has new durability issues and Freo will take a cautious approach to him while their window is open.

If Im wrong about Pav then the votes would be about right.

I always thought Chappy's hamstrings were shot, but he proved me wrong in 2010, 11, 12 playing 20-21 games in each, but like pav he fell away last year.  I think he'll play 18-19 this year (yes it's optimistic) but will spend more time in the 50, so scores will be more reliant on goals therefore more inconsistency.

Pav - 17 games, 105

Chappy - 18 games, 100

Cyril - No idea, I've given up trying to predict him.

Fair enough, if Pav averages 105 that would be good as he's underpriced.
All three are risky though.