Are AFL analyists bias against Richmond or something?

Started by powersuperkents, August 28, 2013, 08:56:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

TheAnt

Quote from: Holzman on September 10, 2013, 04:17:35 PM
Quote from: TheAnt on September 07, 2013, 11:17:51 AM
Quote from: Holzman on August 28, 2013, 10:58:25 AM
Hawks Pies Gellong Freo Sydney are easily better than them so they should be 6 or lower.

Essendon are better than them, but the scandal has stuffed them around.

I might sound bias here but North should be ahead of richmond too. Has pushed all the big sides, took out gellong a few weeks back and almost beat the hawks.

Port v Richmond you can mount a case for richmond to be higher but its close.

7-9 seems fair.


the bias however is against freo, i put them top 2.
No, we finished 5th because we finished 5th and didn't give up 5 goal leads every 3 weeks.

freo to a prelim - so top 2
richmond out round 1
port through to the next round.

seemed like the ranking were fair.
No. You simply can not judge a teams season on a performance vs one team, especially a bogey team. Just a ridiculously flawed argument.