Which combo is better?

[Jigsaw]

Which option do people think is better points wise?

Leaning towards Option 2, but not sure.

Thoughts?

[Adamant]

Stanton and Enright for me.

I've got both Stanton and ROK, and while Stants has been in poor form, I'd expect him to bounce back. He's still averaging more than ROK even with his bad run, back him in.

And Enright >>> Grimes. I've got Grimes and am benching him this week in favour of Duffield. That's saying something lol.

[Jigsaw]

Stanton and Enright for me.

I've got both Stanton and ROK, and while Stants has been in poor form, I'd expect him to bounce back. He's still averaging more than ROK even with his bad run, back him in.

And Enright >>> Grimes. I've got Grimes and am benching him this week in favour of Duffield. That's saying something lol.

Cheers for the thoughts mate. I keep trying to find ways to bench Stanton and field Grimes, but in the end, I feel Stanton/Enright is the better choice as well.

Had Grimes -> Enright locked, but was giving some thought to a points boost.

Looking at the demons with Mckenzie back, he could go to Ablett with the tag, leaving Grimes free. On the other hand, I didn't expect him to tag last week either. Stanton can be anything, whilst I expect ROK to be solid this week.

[pommyadam]

I've got both Stanton and ROK, and while Stants has been in poor form, I'd expect him to bounce back. He's still averaging more than ROK even with his bad run, back him in.

slightly flawed logic there
basically, given nothing more than averages, you'd take Ibbotson over Hanley? - okay.....

Stanton can be anything (and probably will - given his career record vs WC, high of 140 and a low of 34)

that alone leads me to suggest option 1, if Grimes tags Ablett then he'll be around the football getting a few possies anyway
taggers vs Gaj: Scooter 98 (okay, he's DT relevant so we'll ignore him), Curnow 88, Jackson 97, Hocking 76, VanBerlo 86
so a estimate of probably around mid80s for Grimes