How do you decide between playing JOM or TMitch?

[RookieDTer]

Every week I have this problem and 45% of the time I'm wrong. I'd like to make that 33% of the time!

JOM (91avg) (-1) @ expansive Subiaco (+1) v a reasonably depleted and out-of-form team (+1) Last 5 96avg, Last 3 102avg (even), highest 129
v
TMItch (102 avg) (+1) versus a reasonably depleted and out of form team (+1). Last 5 98avg, Last 3 100avg (even), highest 144 (Tmitch, slightly).

Projected score is only two different.

TMitch has the higher "Last" by 25.
One is owned by 44% and the other 41%.

Both rookies.

I'm leaning towards TMitch - higher last, higher average... but it is sooo hard to know.

[Jukes]

Would lean towards Titch, but both are good options. Can't really go wrong imo.

[RookieDTer]

Would lean towards Titch, but both are good options. Can't really go wrong imo.

Or, rather, you will go wronig 45% of the time :)?

[Andrew]

Titchell v Bulldogs better than O'Meara traveling with a 3rd string ruck giving supply. Nicholls out will hurt Gold Coast midfield output, that said David Swallow & Prestia being back should help O'Meara. Titchell for me but both are pretty good bets.

[j959]

make a call and upgrade one of them - then you won't have to 'stress' yourself each week ...

#firstworldissues     ;)

[RookieDTer]

Playing TMItch instead of JOM is the difference between me playing finals in my Friends league and not :(
FF Lead is ranked 255 and I'll make the finals.
My Friends league is ranked 13,739 and I'll miss out on the finals - despite having third highest total points scored.

[Artax]

Playing one as an emergency is one thing but fielding them is too high risk IMO