Henderson v McKenzie

Started by lachie_001, July 25, 2013, 06:28:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which?

Henderson
5 (22.7%)
McKenzie
17 (77.3%)

Total Members Voted: 2

lachie_001

Basically a toss up between these guys to replace hanley

Back line is Goddard, Heppell, Gibbs, Hibberd, Grimes, Hanley (Pittard, Clisby)

m_zulian

Mckenzie. good run home and more proven scorer

Jukes

Cannon for me. Still gets a go at Melbourne, the Saints and- in grand final week- the Giants, and none of the other three games pitches him against a top 7 side (Port, WC and Carlton). He's also been pretty consistently good all season.

Henderson has had none of this consistent premo scores apart from the past month; prior to his injury, he had a 67, 51 and 38, none of which sub affected. Could easily go back to being a mediocre dt'er.

its me lads

Depends is you want a risk but IMO what Henderson could give is what McKenzie should give. Not much difference in score but McKenzie is more consistent and safer. Definately go the Cannon.

essendon2

Quote from: Jukes on July 25, 2013, 06:57:04 PM
Cannon for me. Still gets a go at Melbourne, the Saints and- in grand final week- the Giants, and none of the other three games pitches him against a top 7 side (Port, WC and Carlton). He's also been pretty consistently good all season.

Henderson has had none of this consistent premo scores apart from the past month; prior to his injury, he had a 67, 51 and 38, none of which sub affected. Could easily go back to being a mediocre dt'er.
67 and 51 were in Round 1-2,

Henderson has averaged 90+ since Round 3

RookieDTer

Henderson is cheaper
Henderson has a lower BE
Henderson's highest is higher
Henderson's last month = 108, Mckenzies last month = 85
Henderson's projected score for each game for the rest of the season is higher
Henderson is more unique

Could make stats say anything you want, really.... but I've chosen Henderson.

lachie_001

I think hendersons score should be consistent unless he is given attention, for a lot of the year he didn't really have a real role but he has taken reillys role and is tearing up, plus the low break even and cannon is coming up against Carlton who have been tagging a lot no doubt they will go to ablett but expecting someone to go to him too

Chelskiman

I've gone McKenzie.  Love the way he's playing at the moment.

its me lads

Henderson is cheaper-----Only by $8k   ::)
Consistency rating (lower better) Henderson=40. McKenzie= 16
Henderson's lower is lowest
Henderson's season average = 78, Mckenzies season = 88
Henderson is more unique, so when he fails your the only one who cops it.
Henderson gone under 70=4 times. McKenzie=1 time

Quote from: RookieDTer on July 25, 2013, 07:30:55 PM
Could make stats say anything you want, really.... but I've chosen Henderson.

yes you could  ;)