Who would you bring in for Franklin?

Started by goodes37, July 17, 2013, 01:33:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Who would you bring in for Franklin?

Stokes
1 (6.3%)
Cloke
3 (18.8%)
Roughead
3 (18.8%)
Cox
1 (6.3%)
Martin
5 (31.3%)
Bartel
3 (18.8%)
Keep Franklin
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Voting closed: July 19, 2013, 01:33:01 AM

goodes37


Windigo

I'd boot him.

Go Cloke for his easy run!  :)

Ricochet

I'd keep him for now but look to upgrade soon.
He has the Bullies this week and at 366k I don't think the risk in keeping him is that big

powersuperkents

Are you implying that you don't have at least two-three of Roughie, Cloke, Stokes, Dusty or Bartel in your forwards?

and you don't have Cox altogether?

This is interesting I assumed everyone would be at that point in their teams development :) Can you post your forwards and rucks up because this is interesting, I'm assuming you've gone with more unique options than the go to guys and want to see what the outcome is, I've seen a few of these uniquely picked teams in my league and some of them are very bewildering to come up against because they can potentially pump out a 2200-2300 or settle at 1800 :)

To answer your question I don't think you could go wrong with any of them but I'd avoid picking Cox in the forwards mainly because his recent form and overall Stokes & Dusty are the ones to consider for consistency (Bartel had one good game since I brought him in them two sh#tty performances). Roughie & Cloke for the big outputs (Dusty can deliver that as well) and Bartel as the quality pick (could get rested) :) 

Adamant

Quote from: powersuperkents on July 17, 2013, 05:43:33 PM
Are you implying that you don't have at least two-three of Roughie, Cloke, Stokes, Dusty or Bartel in your forwards?

and you don't have Cox altogether?

This is interesting I assumed everyone would be at that point in their teams development :) Can you post your forwards and rucks up because this is interesting, I'm assuming you've gone with more unique options than the go to guys and want to see what the outcome is, I've seen a few of these uniquely picked teams in my league and some of them are very bewildering to come up against because they can potentially pump out a 2200-2300 or settle at 1800 :)

To answer your question I don't think you could go wrong with any of them but I'd avoid picking Cox in the forwards mainly because his recent form and overall Stokes & Dusty are the ones to consider for consistency (Bartel had one good game since I brought him in them two sh#tty performances). Roughie & Cloke for the big outputs (Dusty can deliver that as well) and Bartel as the quality pick (could get rested) :)

I don't have any of those guys you mentioned either. :o But I've got Cox in my rucks and am looking to bring in Dusty.

powersuperkents

Quote from: Adamant on July 17, 2013, 05:47:48 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on July 17, 2013, 05:43:33 PM
Are you implying that you don't have at least two-three of Roughie, Cloke, Stokes, Dusty or Bartel in your forwards?

and you don't have Cox altogether?

This is interesting I assumed everyone would be at that point in their teams development :) Can you post your forwards and rucks up because this is interesting, I'm assuming you've gone with more unique options than the go to guys and want to see what the outcome is, I've seen a few of these uniquely picked teams in my league and some of them are very bewildering to come up against because they can potentially pump out a 2200-2300 or settle at 1800 :)

To answer your question I don't think you could go wrong with any of them but I'd avoid picking Cox in the forwards mainly because his recent form and overall Stokes & Dusty are the ones to consider for consistency (Bartel had one good game since I brought him in them two sh#tty performances). Roughie & Cloke for the big outputs (Dusty can deliver that as well) and Bartel as the quality pick (could get rested) :)

I don't have any of those guys you mentioned either. :o But I've got Cox in my rucks and am looking to bring in Dusty.
Really? What's your forwardline look like? I know you have Nroo but are the other forwards players like Sylvia, Walker etc.?

goodes37

Quote from: Adamant on July 17, 2013, 05:47:48 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on July 17, 2013, 05:43:33 PM
Are you implying that you don't have at least two-three of Roughie, Cloke, Stokes, Dusty or Bartel in your forwards?

and you don't have Cox altogether?

This is interesting I assumed everyone would be at that point in their teams development :) Can you post your forwards and rucks up because this is interesting, I'm assuming you've gone with more unique options than the go to guys and want to see what the outcome is, I've seen a few of these uniquely picked teams in my league and some of them are very bewildering to come up against because they can potentially pump out a 2200-2300 or settle at 1800 :)

To answer your question I don't think you could go wrong with any of them but I'd avoid picking Cox in the forwards mainly because his recent form and overall Stokes & Dusty are the ones to consider for consistency (Bartel had one good game since I brought him in them two sh#tty performances). Roughie & Cloke for the big outputs (Dusty can deliver that as well) and Bartel as the quality pick (could get rested) :)

I don't have any of those guys you mentioned either. :o But I've got Cox in my rucks and am looking to bring in Dusty.

Rucks Leuenberger and kreuzer.  Forwards Nroo, Rockliff, Kennedy, Monfries, Johnson, Franklin.

powersuperkents

Quote from: goodes37 on July 17, 2013, 06:10:44 PM
Quote from: Adamant on July 17, 2013, 05:47:48 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on July 17, 2013, 05:43:33 PM
Are you implying that you don't have at least two-three of Roughie, Cloke, Stokes, Dusty or Bartel in your forwards?

and you don't have Cox altogether?

This is interesting I assumed everyone would be at that point in their teams development :) Can you post your forwards and rucks up because this is interesting, I'm assuming you've gone with more unique options than the go to guys and want to see what the outcome is, I've seen a few of these uniquely picked teams in my league and some of them are very bewildering to come up against because they can potentially pump out a 2200-2300 or settle at 1800 :)

To answer your question I don't think you could go wrong with any of them but I'd avoid picking Cox in the forwards mainly because his recent form and overall Stokes & Dusty are the ones to consider for consistency (Bartel had one good game since I brought him in them two sh#tty performances). Roughie & Cloke for the big outputs (Dusty can deliver that as well) and Bartel as the quality pick (could get rested) :)

I don't have any of those guys you mentioned either. :o But I've got Cox in my rucks and am looking to bring in Dusty.

Rucks Leuenberger and kreuzer.  Forwards Nroo, Rockliff, Kennedy, Monfries, Johnson, Franklin.
haha okay :) Besides Monfries all of them are pretty standard choices :) I myself brought in Nroo this week for Stevie J (will be trading Franklin to Stevie J next week thanks to a suggestion from Adamant) and I also have Rocky :) I was thinking more Tom Lynch, Walker, Lewis etc. selections :) Would love to bring one of those players in (especially Sylvia) but I feel it's just too much of a risk  :-\

Adamant

Quote from: powersuperkents on July 17, 2013, 05:51:25 PM
Quote from: Adamant on July 17, 2013, 05:47:48 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on July 17, 2013, 05:43:33 PM
Are you implying that you don't have at least two-three of Roughie, Cloke, Stokes, Dusty or Bartel in your forwards?

and you don't have Cox altogether?

This is interesting I assumed everyone would be at that point in their teams development :) Can you post your forwards and rucks up because this is interesting, I'm assuming you've gone with more unique options than the go to guys and want to see what the outcome is, I've seen a few of these uniquely picked teams in my league and some of them are very bewildering to come up against because they can potentially pump out a 2200-2300 or settle at 1800 :)

To answer your question I don't think you could go wrong with any of them but I'd avoid picking Cox in the forwards mainly because his recent form and overall Stokes & Dusty are the ones to consider for consistency (Bartel had one good game since I brought him in them two sh#tty performances). Roughie & Cloke for the big outputs (Dusty can deliver that as well) and Bartel as the quality pick (could get rested) :)

I don't have any of those guys you mentioned either. :o But I've got Cox in my rucks and am looking to bring in Dusty.
Really? What's your forwardline look like? I know you have Nroo but are the other forwards players like Sylvia, Walker etc.?



Robbo has become Dusty this week though.


goodes37

Yeh that forward line is good adamant. Who would you upgrade Terlich, Staker or Brown, i'm looking to get either Gibbs, Ibbotson, Malceski or Enright. Thoughts on what to do?

Adamant

Quote from: goodes37 on July 17, 2013, 06:39:13 PM
Yeh that forward line is good adamant. Who would you upgrade Terlich, Staker or Brown, i'm looking to get either Gibbs, Ibbotson, Malceski or Enright. Thoughts on what to do?

Gibbs is the best option of that lot, but he has a massive B/E this week, so you could hold off for a little while longer...

Enright is safe as houses and should have a strong finish to the season after having his rest already.

What does your backline look like? Staker is coming off two decent scores and will really start to make a lot of cash now. Terlich has probably maxed out and is ready to offload - He has to go if you have solid cover.

goodes37

Quote from: Adamant on July 17, 2013, 06:55:52 PM
Quote from: goodes37 on July 17, 2013, 06:39:13 PM
Yeh that forward line is good adamant. Who would you upgrade Terlich, Staker or Brown, i'm looking to get either Gibbs, Ibbotson, Malceski or Enright. Thoughts on what to do?

Gibbs is the best option of that lot, but he has a massive B/E this week, so you could hold off for a little while longer...

Enright is safe as houses and should have a strong finish to the season after having his rest already.

What does your backline look like? Staker is coming off two decent scores and will really start to make a lot of cash now. Terlich has probably maxed out and is ready to offload - He has to go if you have solid cover.

Goddard, Heppell, Hanley, Terlich, Shaw, Staker.       Brown and Clisby.

powersuperkents

Quote from: Adamant on July 17, 2013, 06:21:51 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on July 17, 2013, 05:51:25 PM
Quote from: Adamant on July 17, 2013, 05:47:48 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on July 17, 2013, 05:43:33 PM
Are you implying that you don't have at least two-three of Roughie, Cloke, Stokes, Dusty or Bartel in your forwards?

and you don't have Cox altogether?

This is interesting I assumed everyone would be at that point in their teams development :) Can you post your forwards and rucks up because this is interesting, I'm assuming you've gone with more unique options than the go to guys and want to see what the outcome is, I've seen a few of these uniquely picked teams in my league and some of them are very bewildering to come up against because they can potentially pump out a 2200-2300 or settle at 1800 :)

To answer your question I don't think you could go wrong with any of them but I'd avoid picking Cox in the forwards mainly because his recent form and overall Stokes & Dusty are the ones to consider for consistency (Bartel had one good game since I brought him in them two sh#tty performances). Roughie & Cloke for the big outputs (Dusty can deliver that as well) and Bartel as the quality pick (could get rested) :)

I don't have any of those guys you mentioned either. :o But I've got Cox in my rucks and am looking to bring in Dusty.
Really? What's your forwardline look like? I know you have Nroo but are the other forwards players like Sylvia, Walker etc.?



Robbo has become Dusty this week though.
haha your forward line wouldn't be deemed unique either  :) and to think that we all expected everyone's teams to end up identical this season  :P