Goldstein vs Leuenberger

Started by shorty3264, April 16, 2013, 05:22:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Who to get in for Kreuzer?

Todd Goldstein
7 (38.9%)
Matthew Leuenberger
11 (61.1%)

Total Members Voted: 0

shorty3264

With Krezeur going down, one of these guys will be coming in. Goldstein I believe is a great scorer, and looks set to average 105-115. Whereas Berger should average 90-100, obviously concerned about his body too and I gain a lot of cash from it. Thoughts guys?

jfitty

I'm considering the same two myself. Initially I leant towards Goldstein for his scoring potential, but the extra cash freed up by going with Leuenberger is very appealing. He has started pretty well, and you would think he can only get better from here, and worst case is you swap him for another ruck when he hits ~450k. Although Goldstein would be a no-risk set and forget (not that Leuy couldn't be a keeper) but you know he is capable of big scores.

Very slight lean towards Leuenberger for me.

shorty3264

Quote from: jfitty on April 16, 2013, 05:28:25 PM
I'm considering the same two myself. Initially I leant towards Goldstein for his scoring potential, but the extra cash freed up by going with Leuenberger is very appealing. He has started pretty well, and you would think he can only get better from here, and worst case is you swap him for another ruck when he hits ~450k. Although Goldstein would be a no-risk set and forget (not that Leuy couldn't be a keeper) but you know he is capable of big scores.

Very slight lean towards Leuenberger for me.
Yeh spot on. my thoughts too, At this stage its Berger. Just for the potential of upgrading to premiums all over the ground quicker. Cheers.

ubeaut


jfitty

Quote from: shorty3264 on April 16, 2013, 05:44:34 PM
Quote from: jfitty on April 16, 2013, 05:28:25 PM
I'm considering the same two myself. Initially I leant towards Goldstein for his scoring potential, but the extra cash freed up by going with Leuenberger is very appealing. He has started pretty well, and you would think he can only get better from here, and worst case is you swap him for another ruck when he hits ~450k. Although Goldstein would be a no-risk set and forget (not that Leuy couldn't be a keeper) but you know he is capable of big scores.

Very slight lean towards Leuenberger for me.
Yeh spot on. my thoughts too, At this stage its Berger. Just for the potential of upgrading to premiums all over the ground quicker. Cheers.

Having around 200k in the bank (depending on how much you had before) I think is extremely handy at this stage of the year. That is pretty much one upgrade sorted by round 5-6 (Goodes > Waters, Dwyer > Pavlich for example) without you losing too much scoring potential. Great trade for mine.

shorty3264

Quote from: jfitty on April 16, 2013, 06:01:18 PM
Quote from: shorty3264 on April 16, 2013, 05:44:34 PM
Quote from: jfitty on April 16, 2013, 05:28:25 PM
I'm considering the same two myself. Initially I leant towards Goldstein for his scoring potential, but the extra cash freed up by going with Leuenberger is very appealing. He has started pretty well, and you would think he can only get better from here, and worst case is you swap him for another ruck when he hits ~450k. Although Goldstein would be a no-risk set and forget (not that Leuy couldn't be a keeper) but you know he is capable of big scores.

Very slight lean towards Leuenberger for me.
Yeh spot on. my thoughts too, At this stage its Berger. Just for the potential of upgrading to premiums all over the ground quicker. Cheers.

Having around 200k in the bank (depending on how much you had before) I think is extremely handy at this stage of the year. That is pretty much one upgrade sorted by round 5-6 (Goodes > Waters, Dwyer > Pavlich for example) without you losing too much scoring potential. Great trade for mine.
Yeh I think that will be the move, thanks. A few midfield guns had poor weeks on the weekend too, they should be a bit cheaper in three weeks also.