Y or N - Currie to Blicavs woth it?

[tigertops]

have 1 trade left this week and thinking of using it to trade currie to blicavs.

just so as i can get blicavs in to generate some cash.

HMac, Vardy and Simpson all out indefinately so he might play a few more games yet also.

currie sitting there doin nothing.

thinking better to get blicavs in and at least make some cash from R4 posi ??

dont ahve any other trade to make.

whaty u all reckon?

thanks for your votes

[Colliwobblers]

its not a great trade as it probably wont make you a ton of cash, but it will make you some, and i doubt currie will ever get a game with goldy fit.

the injury issues with hmac and the others plus the fact the cats need to keep developing the youth make blicavs a decent bench ruck possibly for a while yet.

i voted yes but just.

[Jroo]

I don't think it's worth wasting a trade. I think Blicavs will be coming out of that side soon, when Vardy and HMac come back.

[westy501]

DO IT! Currie wont get a game this side of round 12 unless something happens to currie... use the trade blcavs will have at least 2 price changes if not more... go for the cash every dollar counts

[Baggers2012]

Personally, 29/30 of the players in my squad have played this year. Currie the exception. I think it is worth having a rookie that isn't playing for the VC loophole. Just my thoughts anyway. This week it's not beneficial though with North playing saturday arvo, im somewhat happy Macaffer's out so i can still apply the loophole with Cox as VC.

i think if you have all your other rookies playing, keep him. Blicavs won't make anywhere near as much money as some of the defence & midfield options anyway.

[tigertops]

got caffer also for the VC loophole.
actually dont like caffers chances of coming back in soon either.
all other rookies are playing.
if i dont trade him ill have 2 VC looophole players.  but i miss out on some blicav cash..

goin for overall, if that makes a difference