IF Mitchell is sub/omitted.....how to bring in another

[colmullet]

From a look ove rmy team these are the only real options to raise the money. 3 prem backs all played, Mundy my mid-priced mid played. Rocky the only prem forward yet to play and im not changing him......

B.Hill named on field is a good sign and looks to have first crack at sucklings spot?


All this will only occur if Mitchell is omitted or maybe the sub

[GoLions]

Do you have all of Wines, Viney, and Jones? Could just change him to one of them.

[colmullet]

i thought about Jones, have the other two....but Jones is last spot on the extended bench aswell....to me Hill named on field on the wing seems a bit of a better option

[Big Mac]

i thought about Jones, have the other two....but Jones is last spot on the extended bench aswell....to me Hill named on field on the wing seems a bit of a better option

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2013-03-28/new-look-dees-team-for-season-opener
'Mature age recruit Matt Jones and ex-Roo Cam Pedersen have also been confirmed in the starting 22, despite the duo being named on the extended interchange.'

Looks pretty reassuring to me...

[colmullet]

if thats the case ill definitely jump on Jones

[sammy123]

IMO mitchell wont be sub. But i could ve wrong. Just my opinion

[colmullet]

well with the uncertainty with Mitchell and Jones and the sub im thinking i might do one of these just to keep my options open as much as i can till i find out with these two....if they both are subs then ill bring in Hill