Three position tussle - what would you do?

acroyale · March 17, 2013, 10:30:26 AM

Currently Have - S. Jacobs (100), Moloney (85) & Heppell (85)
Contemplating - Maric (110), Mundy (105) plus rookie (55) Maybe Brown or Heath (Currently have Pittard, Terlich, Stevenson & Goodes) - also have cash left over.

Please suggest pros and cons

Hank2011 · March 17, 2013, 11:04:40 AM

The option you currently have is safe, but common. the option you are contemplating is considerably more differentiated and a little braver. I would go with option 2 and avoid being bored with supercoach after 5 rounds given everyone has essentially the same team after 11 rounds anyway

GoLions · March 17, 2013, 01:12:12 PM

I'd probably go with option 2. Think Mundy can go 110, maybe higher if he reaches his best form.

Knowall · March 17, 2013, 01:32:06 PM

Yea id do it as well.

I reckon the third rookie you willl have to start will at least score 55. It be more like 65. Brown and Heath both look like theyll play round 1 at this stage

Mark · March 17, 2013, 03:11:18 PM

What Brown ?

And C.Heath yeah ??

I'd go option 2 also

Jroo · March 17, 2013, 03:21:11 PM

Quote from: Mark on March 17, 2013, 03:11:18 PM
What Brown ?

And C.Heath yeah ??

I'd go option 2 also

Luke Brown.
I like option one more.
I think Moloney will average close to 90-95.
This is my thoughts:
Jacobs 105 + Moloney 95 + Heppell + 90
Maric 110 + Mundy 100 + Rookie 70
So I'd go with option one.

acroyale · March 17, 2013, 10:51:11 PM

Thanks for your comments - Option 1 is safer and means I play one less rookie. @Jroo I think the differential between Mundy & Moloney will be a lot higher by end of season, but I only care about the first 5 rounds with Moloney whereas Mundy would likely be my M8.

As comments are mixed - I am still not sure. May look at going a cheaper ruck and stronger back. Rest of my team is set just these 3 spots.