bit of a mid priced strategy

Started by cortez, March 12, 2013, 10:15:40 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Anubis

Viney will ave more than Stevens and Viney has been told he is playing round 1 for sure

cortez

Quote from: big_cox21 on March 14, 2013, 04:50:35 PM
Really like what you have here man

Ryder is a weak F1. But those three can all finish top 10 fwds so it doesn't matter

Def is super strong

Mid are solid as are rucks. Mundy at 4 isn't great but alot of people really like the guy. So if he goes for 110+ your laughing.

I give you a 8.5/10. Very sound team

Check mine out http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,72949.0.html

Thanks

Cheers for the review mate, Ill definately have a look at yours. And yea I'd love Mundy to go 110+ thats what i am hoping for anyway and with Ryder being at number 1 well Cox has been all preseason but have moved him to rucks because of Leuy going down and have brought in Kennedy to replace Luey basically so i guess you could look at it as Cox still being number 1 forward and Kennedy being number 2 ruck lol

cortez

Quote from: Anubis on March 14, 2013, 05:11:41 PM
Viney will ave more than S?tevens and Viney has been told he is playing round 1 for sure

Thats allyou got to say?
Do you even have any reason for saying that?

Ringo

Like team Cortez

Little tweak I would do but up to you - Ryder to Ruck - Cox to Forward - Rowe to Ruck in place of Witts for flexibility and bring in Neade or another playing rookie.

Mundy may be a bit of risk at M4 but if he can get back to 115 average then you will be set,

With this strategy be prepared to trade mid pricers out early if not performing as you are relying on Grimes, Mundy, Moloney and forwards to fire to make it work so can not have them languishing.

big_cox21

Quote from: cortez on March 14, 2013, 05:14:44 PM
Quote from: big_cox21 on March 14, 2013, 04:50:35 PM
Really like what you have here man

Ryder is a weak F1. But those three can all finish top 10 fwds so it doesn't matter

Def is super strong

Mid are solid as are rucks. Mundy at 4 isn't great but alot of people really like the guy. So if he goes for 110+ your laughing.

I give you a 8.5/10. Very sound team

Check mine out http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,72949.0.html

Thanks

Cheers for the review mate, Ill definately have a look at yours. And yea I'd love Mundy to go 110+ thats what i am hoping for anyway and with Ryder being at number 1 well Cox has been all preseason but have moved him to rucks because of Leuy going down and have brought in Kennedy to replace Luey basically so i guess you could look at it as Cox still being number 1 forward and Kennedy being number 2 ruck lol

hahaha thats funny coz thats exactly what happened with my team. leuey out kennedy in. fair enought thats great theN, REALLY GOOD

cortez

Quote from: Ringo on March 14, 2013, 05:52:46 PM
Like team Cortez

Little tweak I would do but up to you - Ryder to Ruck - Cox to Forward - Rowe to Ruck in place of Witts for flexibility and bring in Neade or another playing rookie.

Mundy may be a bit of risk at M4 but if he can get back to 115 average then you will be set,

With this strategy be prepared to trade mid pricers out early if not performing as you are relying on Grimes, Mundy, Moloney and forwards to fire to make it work so can not have them languishing.

Whats the point of changing Ryder and Cox around they both will still be on th ground and your not going to lose or gain any points  :-\

And with Rowe i have him starting there so i can swap him and Cox around when i upgrade a ruckman.
You dont think Witts will get game time?

Ringo

Need to concentrate a little more Cortez sorry thought you had a mid price ruck. (So many teams I have seen have Smith or similar).  So disregard what I said. Strategy is sound to upgrade to Nat,

Not sure whether Witts will get games either. Has not taken his chance in the NAB Cup.

cortez

Quote from: Ringo on March 14, 2013, 07:19:17 PM
Need to concentrate a little more Cortez sorry thought you had a mid price ruck. (So many teams I have seen have Smith or similar).  So disregard what I said. Strategy is sound to upgrade to Nat,

Not sure whether Witts will get games either. Has not taken his chance in the NAB Cup.

Ah k cool, was a bit confused there, anyone you reckon would be a better R4 than Witts? Maybe Daw? But I dont feel confident having Daw and Currie both on my ruck bench or maybe you could look at it as 1 should play each week?

Ringo

My thoughts only, are Currie and Goldy can not play together but Daw and Goldy can in Norths structure.  So you could risk both as when one is not playing the other will.  Other alternative is Grundy but I would be looking at him as a downgrade target in 6/8 weeks. Gorringe may be worth a punt but is $30k more.

cortez

Quote from: Ringo on March 14, 2013, 07:34:06 PM
My thoughts only, are Currie and Goldy can not play together but Daw and Goldy can in Norths structure.  So you could risk both as when one is not playing the other will.  Other alternative is Grundy but I would be looking at him as a downgrade target in 6/8 weeks. Gorringe may be worth a punt but is $30k more.

Cheers mate, it's definitely a bit of an unknown!

Anubis

Quote from: cortez on March 14, 2013, 05:25:58 PM
Quote from: Anubis on March 14, 2013, 05:11:41 PM
Viney will ave more than S?tevens and Viney has been told he is playing round 1 for sure

Thats allyou got to say?
Do you even have any reason for saying that?

What more do you need to know?

EL TIGER