swan and/or ablett???? both one none??????

[eaglesman]

midfield is currently swan ablett mackay masten trengove martin

having swan and ablett is that a gd idea or should i get rid of ablett(for bartel or others???? and free up 40k?) due to him being not being as durable as swan?

[valkorum]

At the end of the season you will probably want both Swan and Ablett in your team.  I personally think its worth only having one of them in your team from the start.

Which one:  Take your pick, they are both awesome.

I dont mind your idea of Ablett down to Bartel and using the money elsewhere.

[Dougal]

Well, imo if u hav both ablett and swan it leaves the rest of ur team too threadbare in the fwds and backs.
With swan, u also must think about a possible tag (as he has never been before) after his form last year and how that will affect his DT score.
Personally ive got neither.

[Cicjose]

I have both in my team. i have also got 3 premium backs, 3 premium forwards and 1 midprice back and forward with 4 rookie midfielders. its a gamble that im willing to take.

No Risk No Reward right?

[brodman_18]

Buy ablett OR Swan and 4 rookie mids. You can have both by week 8-10

[ben0-1985]

i have swan. also have 3 mid price, and 4 rookies. Risky, but im betting thatmy rookies are all starters, and sky rocket in price. Have a stellar side by round 10-12.

Forward and backs are covered well. each with 2-3 rookies i hope will play.

Fingers crossed the gamble pays off. Might lose a few rounds at the start, but its the league im focusing on.