Zorko, Bellchambers and Cox

Started by tbagrocks, March 12, 2013, 03:30:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

which combo

Zorko F, Cox R
7 (43.8%)
Cox F, Belly R
7 (43.8%)
Cox F, Mummy/Goldy R
2 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 0

tbagrocks

Zorko F  Cox R1
        or
Cox F  Belly R1

Who is better, Belly or Zorko? Or Goldy/Mumford?

Mumford worries me with Pyke going so well

tor01doc

Zorko is not $75900 better than Bellchambers in this year's SC.

Bellchambers is likely to improve, as could Zorko, but the extra money can be well spent elsewhere.

Especially with our budget R2 not likely.

Also Rocky, Karnezis, Cornelius and Browny don't want Zorko there as well!

Southstorm

Bellchambers will love being the #1 ruck at Essendon since it seems we finally know what to do with Paddy Ryder. I don't think Zorko has the same potential to improve as Bellchambers and Bellchambers could very well crack 100ppg.

tbagrocks

Guess the problem with Belly is he'd need to be a keeper, if Smith is R2 but might bench Berger to save a trade, someone will need to be upgraded

More risks to be considered in DT not SC