3 risks?

[the danger porps]

Thinking of starting T.Greene, J.Giles and T.Walker?? Too risky?

[jhello234]

It's not too bad,but I wouldn't start with Giles.

[the danger porps]

i agree, have up graded to IVAN, however am really concerened whether tex will outscore cloke and NROO? and if Greene will outscore any mid under his price?

[tbagrocks]

i agree, have up graded to IVAN, however am really concerened whether tex will outscore cloke and NROO? and if Greene will outscore any mid under his price?

Is the pope a Catholic?

Greene could do anything any probably will, but i'm staying away in year two

[Ricochet]

Walker is probably the safest of the three
The two GWS boys are way too risky imo

[Justin Bieber]

Walker will easily out average Choke and Nroo

[morelli89]

Walker is probably the safest of the three
The two GWS boys are way too risky imo

i disagree, i think T.Greene is the safest option as he wins his own ball. I would go Walker over Cloke and Nroo as well

[Chopps]

i cant help but worry with second year blues worth a risk and if it fails trade him but at 495 you are so close to getting guys that ll go 105 with no doubt, i d even say spend 10 k and go jack over greene. other potentials redden, dangerfield, J or S Selwood. all of these would be safer bets unless you are tipping greene to go 110 in his second year

[Hagebear]

They're all risky I their own right. But I definitely wouldn't start with all 3.  I don't mind Toby Greene but I wouldn't mess around with premo mids too much. Too many points to lose there. Giles is alright but rucking for GWS is a big risk. Feel there are better options for a tad more money and Tex is a KPP forward. So will be a roller coaster ride there. Flip a coin but make sure u have a contingency plan if it doesn't work out.

[Windigo]

I reckon Giles is a bit of a risk. Greene is just pure dominance, would be a good POD and not the worst pick in the world.

Walker should progress nicely but can't help but feel your money is better spent on other fwds...